in Search
0 members online
 
 
 
Stay healthy and informed while supporting antiaging medicine
 

Browse by Tags

All Tags » ethics » Opinion » Public Involvement   (RSS)
Showing page 1 of 2 (12 total posts)
  • Environmental groups dispute about nanotechnology

    We mentioned earlier a request for comment on a proposed Nano Risk Framework for approaching nanotechnology materials safety organized by Environmental Defense and DuPont. Now a different group of organizations has come out against that framework. Their statement is titled “Civil Society-Labor Coalition Rejects Fundamentally Flawed ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on April 13, 2007
  • Your chance to influence nanotechnology policy

    If you’re a Foresight member, you’re already helping improve nanotechnology policy, but here’s another way: apply to participate in the upcoming online course Debating Science and The Nanotechnology Debate. In the syllabus (pdf), the actual course name appears to be “Debating Science: Practical Reasoning and ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on February 23, 2007
  • Nanotechnology hazard symbol misleading

    We should assume that those participating the ETC Group’s nanotechnology hazard symbol contest are all trying to be helpful, and such a symbol may someday be of some use. However, of the three top symbols named as winners, the first one — by far the most vivid — has a real problem. First, see the [...]
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on January 24, 2007
  • Nanotechnology prof boggles nano community

    On the plane back from last week’s U.S. National Nanotechnology Coordinating Office-sponsored workshop on ethics and nanotechnology, I dug into the report “Health and Nanotechnology: Economic, Societal, and Institutional Impact” (not on web, as far as I can tell). This was the result of a meeting sponsored by the U.S. ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on January 15, 2007
  • Sensible Swiss views on nanotechnology benefits, downsides

    Switzerland’s Centre for Technology Assessment has issued its report Public Reactions to Nanotechnology in Switzerland (428 KB pdf), and — not surprisingly — it’s relatively balanced. From page 33 (page 35 of pdf file): “There’s a good and a bad side to everything” — This saying sums up quite well the way that the ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on December 22, 2006
  • Nanotechnology regulations at city level: Unhelpful

    Red Herring reports that the city of Berkeley, California, has voted to approve its own nanoparticle regulations: On Tuesday night the Berkeley, California City Council passed an ordinance to regulate the use of manufactured nanoparticles, tiny subatomic [sic] materials that can be 100,000 times smaller than the width of human hair… Now ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on December 14, 2006
  • Nanotechnology for cognitive enhancement: okay or not

    Cognitive enhancement technologies already exist — if you drink coffee, you’re a user — so it seems likely that nanotechnology will eventually be used for this purpose. A new report (pdf) from the Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes at ASU summarizes the results of a workshop on this topic held with Sandia. [...]
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on December 11, 2006
  • Facing up to military nanotechnology

    A new book by German physicist Jürgen Altmann of Dortmund University looks at Military Nanotechnology: Potential Applications and Preventive Arms Control (Routledge, 2006). Both near-term and long-term applications are examined. From the abstract: NT applications will likely pervade all areas of the military…By using NT to miniaturise ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on December 4, 2006
  • Nanotechnology surveillance & privacy: an interview

    Earth & Sky interviewed yours truly on the topic of nanotechnology surveillance and nanoprivacy. It looks as though there are both a transcript and a couple of podcasts (1, 2). Excerpts: Nanotechnology will produce new sensors that can analyze chemical signals in our environment. And of course, we as individuals send off chemical signals ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on December 1, 2006
  • Common sense about Samsung silver nanotechnology

    Nanowerk reports that the German branch of Friends of the Earth (BUND) is calling for Samsung to withdraw from the market its washing machine using silver nanoparticles: …BUND criticized that considerable amounts of silver could enter sewage plants and seriously trouble the biologic purification process of the waste water. In addition, ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on November 21, 2006
1 2 Next >
Advertise | Help | Contact | About | Terms | Privacy | Copyright © 2007 Betterhumans | Powered by Community Server | Partners:
World Transhumanist Association Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Immortality Institute Methuselah Mouse Prize Foresight Institute Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Lifeboat Foundation