in Search
0 members online
 
 
 
Stay healthy and informed while supporting antiaging medicine
 

Browse by Tags

All Tags » ethics » Opinion » Environment, Health, and Safety   (RSS)
Showing page 1 of 2 (12 total posts)
  • Nanotechnology or not: Iron seeding of ocean seems premature at best

    Regular readers of Nanodot know that we often disagree with ETC Group — but not always. They have issued a press release condemning a plan by a private firm to seed the ocean with iron particles in an effort to fight global warming. An excerpt: As worrying, Planktos boasts on their website that the [...]
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on May 3, 2007
  • Environmental groups dispute about nanotechnology

    We mentioned earlier a request for comment on a proposed Nano Risk Framework for approaching nanotechnology materials safety organized by Environmental Defense and DuPont. Now a different group of organizations has come out against that framework. Their statement is titled “Civil Society-Labor Coalition Rejects Fundamentally Flawed ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on April 13, 2007
  • Windows Vista: potential negative impact on nanotechnology

    John Walker brings to our attention an apparently distressing set of concerning regarding the new version of Windows, known as Vista, written up by Peter Gutman as A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection. Excerpts: The only way to protect the HFS [Hardware Functionality Scan] process therefore is to not release any technical details ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on February 12, 2007
  • Nanotechnology hazard symbol misleading

    We should assume that those participating the ETC Group’s nanotechnology hazard symbol contest are all trying to be helpful, and such a symbol may someday be of some use. However, of the three top symbols named as winners, the first one — by far the most vivid — has a real problem. First, see the [...]
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on January 24, 2007
  • Nanotechnology prof boggles nano community

    On the plane back from last week’s U.S. National Nanotechnology Coordinating Office-sponsored workshop on ethics and nanotechnology, I dug into the report “Health and Nanotechnology: Economic, Societal, and Institutional Impact” (not on web, as far as I can tell). This was the result of a meeting sponsored by the U.S. ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on January 15, 2007
  • Sensible Swiss views on nanotechnology benefits, downsides

    Switzerland’s Centre for Technology Assessment has issued its report Public Reactions to Nanotechnology in Switzerland (428 KB pdf), and — not surprisingly — it’s relatively balanced. From page 33 (page 35 of pdf file): “There’s a good and a bad side to everything” — This saying sums up quite well the way that the ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on December 22, 2006
  • Nanotechnology regulations at city level: Unhelpful

    Red Herring reports that the city of Berkeley, California, has voted to approve its own nanoparticle regulations: On Tuesday night the Berkeley, California City Council passed an ordinance to regulate the use of manufactured nanoparticles, tiny subatomic [sic] materials that can be 100,000 times smaller than the width of human hair… Now ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on December 14, 2006
  • Common sense about Samsung silver nanotechnology

    Nanowerk reports that the German branch of Friends of the Earth (BUND) is calling for Samsung to withdraw from the market its washing machine using silver nanoparticles: …BUND criticized that considerable amounts of silver could enter sewage plants and seriously trouble the biologic purification process of the waste water. In addition, ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on November 21, 2006
  • Nanotechnology risks? Ask the economists

    Darrell Dvorak at MidwestBusiness.com points out that there’s often some expertise missing from discussions on nanotech risk: Because nanotech operates at the molecular level, there has been much speculation about new, unknown risks of nano products and processes… An encouraging development for a fact-based approach is that ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on October 24, 2006
  • Think twice before labeling nanotechnology products

    The ETC Group, recently mentioned here for its PR skills, has announced a contest to design a Nano-Hazard symbol for nanotechnology: Standard setting bodies around the world are now scrambling to agree on nomenclature that can describe nanoparticles and nanomaterials. A common, internationally-recognized symbol warning of the presence of ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on October 10, 2006
1 2 Next >
Advertise | Help | Contact | About | Terms | Privacy | Copyright © 2007 Betterhumans | Powered by Community Server | Partners:
World Transhumanist Association Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Immortality Institute Methuselah Mouse Prize Foresight Institute Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Lifeboat Foundation