|
|
|
0 members online
|
|
Stay healthy and informed while supporting antiaging medicine
|
Browse by Tags
All Tags » ethics » Nanotech » NanoEducation (RSS)
-
Nanowerk reports on a new nanotechnology ethics database at IIT: NanoEthicsBank. Perhaps the most interesting aspect is their experiment with participatory tagging:
In conjunction with the fixed subject terms used in the NanoEthicsBank, we are also developing an experimental “folksonomy” tagging system for the database. A folksonomy ...
-
If you’re a Foresight member, you’re already helping improve nanotechnology policy, but here’s another way: apply to participate in the upcoming online course Debating Science and The Nanotechnology Debate. In the syllabus (pdf), the actual course name appears to be “Debating Science: Practical Reasoning and ...
-
EurActiv.com reports on a citizens’ panel on nanotechnology held by the Ile de France region:
Citizens find nanotechs ‘elitist’
A citizens’ conference on nanotechnologies in France found public information on nanosciences difficult to access for non-specialists.
The report itself (PDF) is in French, but an Altavista ...
-
We should assume that those participating the ETC Group’s nanotechnology hazard symbol contest are all trying to be helpful, and such a symbol may someday be of some use. However, of the three top symbols named as winners, the first one — by far the most vivid — has a real problem.
First, see the [...]
-
On the plane back from last week’s U.S. National Nanotechnology Coordinating Office-sponsored workshop on ethics and nanotechnology, I dug into the report “Health and Nanotechnology: Economic, Societal, and Institutional Impact” (not on web, as far as I can tell). This was the result of a meeting sponsored by the U.S. ...
-
Regular readers of Nanodot know that we rarely use this space to “bleg” (i.e., request donations via blog). We make an exception for our annual $40,000 Challenge Grant, during which your donations are doubled. As this is posted, we have about $30,000 to go.
Take each example below and multiply the payoff by two [...]
-
Switzerland’s Centre for Technology Assessment has issued its report Public Reactions to Nanotechnology in Switzerland (428 KB pdf), and — not surprisingly — it’s relatively balanced. From page 33 (page 35 of pdf file):
“There’s a good and a bad side to everything” — This saying sums up quite well the way that the ...
|
|
|