in Search
0 members online
 
 
 
Stay healthy and informed while supporting antiaging medicine
 

Browse by Tags

All Tags » Opinion » Nanotechnology ... » Nanotech   (RSS)
Showing page 1 of 4 (36 total posts)
  • Philosopher confused by longevity, nanotechnology

    The May/June Technology Review (free reg. req’d) features an essay by philosopher Roger Scruton attempting to examine the ethical issues of highly advanced technologies. While the focus is on biotech, nanotech is hinted at: …why cannot machines be produced as humans are now produced, by self-reproduction? Why not indeed. They ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on June 1, 2007
  • Competing nanotechnology control frameworks

    We’ve written here before about the Environmental Defense/DuPont effort to create a framework to deal with nanotechnology environmental, health, and safety (EHS) risks. Now NRDC has issued its own report and framework. An excerpt from the report: The current approach to chemical regulation cannot be relied upon to prevent harm from ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on May 17, 2007
  • Nanotechnology or not: Iron seeding of ocean seems premature at best

    Regular readers of Nanodot know that we often disagree with ETC Group — but not always. They have issued a press release condemning a plan by a private firm to seed the ocean with iron particles in an effort to fight global warming. An excerpt: As worrying, Planktos boasts on their website that the [...]
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on May 3, 2007
  • Russia: $1 billion from oil into nanotechnology

    BusinessWeek.com reports that nanotechnology is the next big thing in Russia: Russia will pour over $1 billion into equipment for nanotechnology research over the next three years as it uses massive oil and gas export earnings to diversify an economy now heavily dependent on raw materials, First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on April 19, 2007
  • Realism on the size of nanotechnology market

    Michael Berger of the useful Nanowerk website has produced a clarification essay on the size of the nanotechnology market, helping to put the hype in perspective. Some excerpts: First of all, these market size forecasts are dealing with what is called evolutionary nanotechnology. The goal of evolutionary nanotechnology is to improve existing ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on April 18, 2007
  • Environmental groups dispute about nanotechnology

    We mentioned earlier a request for comment on a proposed Nano Risk Framework for approaching nanotechnology materials safety organized by Environmental Defense and DuPont. Now a different group of organizations has come out against that framework. Their statement is titled “Civil Society-Labor Coalition Rejects Fundamentally Flawed ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on April 13, 2007
  • Nanotechnology patent problems blamed on unionization

    Small Times reports on a meeting held in Oregon among a wide variety of nanotechnology-based business participants, at which many commercialization challenges were discussed. One was difficulties encountered with the U.S. Patent office: Start-ups expressed frustration with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Long waits for patent ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on April 9, 2007
  • Visionary Congressional report on nanotechnology

    Nanowerk brings our attention to a new report by the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress titled Nanotechnology: The Future is Coming Sooner Than You Think (pdf), apparently authored by Senior Economist Joseph V. Kennedy and sponsored by Rep. Jim Saxton (R-NJ). On molecular nanosystems: At this stage a single product will integrate a ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on March 29, 2007
  • Your chance to influence nanotechnology policy

    If you’re a Foresight member, you’re already helping improve nanotechnology policy, but here’s another way: apply to participate in the upcoming online course Debating Science and The Nanotechnology Debate. In the syllabus (pdf), the actual course name appears to be “Debating Science: Practical Reasoning and ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on February 23, 2007
  • Nanotechnology hazard symbol misleading

    We should assume that those participating the ETC Group’s nanotechnology hazard symbol contest are all trying to be helpful, and such a symbol may someday be of some use. However, of the three top symbols named as winners, the first one — by far the most vivid — has a real problem. First, see the [...]
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on January 24, 2007
1 2 3 4 Next >
Advertise | Help | Contact | About | Terms | Privacy | Copyright © 2007 Betterhumans | Powered by Community Server | Partners:
World Transhumanist Association Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Immortality Institute Methuselah Mouse Prize Foresight Institute Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Lifeboat Foundation