|
|
|
0 members online
|
|
Stay healthy and informed while supporting antiaging medicine
|
Browse by Tags
All Tags » Nanotech » Environment, He... » Opinion (RSS)
Showing page 1 of 2 (13 total posts)
-
We’ve written here before about the Environmental Defense/DuPont effort to create a framework to deal with nanotechnology environmental, health, and safety (EHS) risks. Now NRDC has issued its own report and framework. An excerpt from the report:
The current approach to chemical regulation cannot be relied upon to prevent harm from ...
-
Regular readers of Nanodot know that we often disagree with ETC Group — but not always. They have issued a press release condemning a plan by a private firm to seed the ocean with iron particles in an effort to fight global warming. An excerpt:
As worrying, Planktos boasts on their website that the [...]
-
We mentioned earlier a request for comment on a proposed Nano Risk Framework for approaching nanotechnology materials safety organized by Environmental Defense and DuPont. Now a different group of organizations has come out against that framework. Their statement is titled “Civil Society-Labor Coalition Rejects Fundamentally Flawed ...
-
John Walker brings to our attention an apparently distressing set of concerning regarding the new version of Windows, known as Vista, written up by Peter Gutman as A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection. Excerpts:
The only way to protect the HFS [Hardware Functionality Scan] process therefore is to not release any technical details ...
-
We should assume that those participating the ETC Group’s nanotechnology hazard symbol contest are all trying to be helpful, and such a symbol may someday be of some use. However, of the three top symbols named as winners, the first one — by far the most vivid — has a real problem.
First, see the [...]
-
On the plane back from last week’s U.S. National Nanotechnology Coordinating Office-sponsored workshop on ethics and nanotechnology, I dug into the report “Health and Nanotechnology: Economic, Societal, and Institutional Impact” (not on web, as far as I can tell). This was the result of a meeting sponsored by the U.S. ...
-
Switzerland’s Centre for Technology Assessment has issued its report Public Reactions to Nanotechnology in Switzerland (428 KB pdf), and — not surprisingly — it’s relatively balanced. From page 33 (page 35 of pdf file):
“There’s a good and a bad side to everything” — This saying sums up quite well the way that the ...
-
Red Herring reports that the city of Berkeley, California, has voted to approve its own nanoparticle regulations:
On Tuesday night the Berkeley, California City Council passed an ordinance to regulate the use of manufactured nanoparticles, tiny subatomic [sic] materials that can be 100,000 times smaller than the width of human hair…
Now ...
-
Nanowerk reports that the German branch of Friends of the Earth (BUND) is calling for Samsung to withdraw from the market its washing machine using silver nanoparticles:
…BUND criticized that considerable amounts of silver could enter sewage plants and seriously trouble the biologic purification process of the waste water. In addition, ...
-
Darrell Dvorak at MidwestBusiness.com points out that there’s often some expertise missing from discussions on nanotech risk:
Because nanotech operates at the molecular level, there has been much speculation about new, unknown risks of nano products and processes…
An encouraging development for a fact-based approach is that ...
1
|
|
|