in Search
0 members online
 
 
 
Stay healthy and informed while supporting antiaging medicine
 

Browse by Tags

All Tags » Nanotech report... » Opinion   (RSS)
Showing page 1 of 2 (16 total posts)
  • Competing nanotechnology control frameworks

    We’ve written here before about the Environmental Defense/DuPont effort to create a framework to deal with nanotechnology environmental, health, and safety (EHS) risks. Now NRDC has issued its own report and framework. An excerpt from the report: The current approach to chemical regulation cannot be relied upon to prevent harm from ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on May 17, 2007
  • Visionary Congressional report on nanotechnology

    Nanowerk brings our attention to a new report by the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress titled Nanotechnology: The Future is Coming Sooner Than You Think (pdf), apparently authored by Senior Economist Joseph V. Kennedy and sponsored by Rep. Jim Saxton (R-NJ). On molecular nanosystems: At this stage a single product will integrate a ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on March 29, 2007
  • Nanotechnology health uses to grow hugely

    Small Times reports that nanotechnology medical applications are expected to climb immensely: U.S. demand for nanotechnology medical products will increase over 17 percent per year to $53 billion in 2011, says The Freedonia Group, Inc., a Cleveland-based industry research firm. Afterwards, the increasing flow of new nanomedicines, ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on March 20, 2007
  • Nanotechnology for health: 10-year EU-US perspective

    A while back I offered to write more about Health and Nanotechnology: Economic, Societal, and Institutional Impact, a report from a conference convened with the cooperation of the U.S. Dept. of State and the European Commission, part of a series called Perspectives on the Future of Science and Technology, which has a ten-year time horizon. [...]
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on March 9, 2007
  • Nanotechnology magazine competition: you decide

    Fortunately for us, Elsevier and the Institute of Nanotechnology — both based in Europe — are competing for eyeballs in the nanotechnology magazine race. This means they are letting us see their publications for free online, at least for now. From the IoN we have the excitedly-named new monthly “NanoNOW!”, the first issue of which ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on February 21, 2007
  • Nanotechnology prof boggles nano community

    On the plane back from last week’s U.S. National Nanotechnology Coordinating Office-sponsored workshop on ethics and nanotechnology, I dug into the report “Health and Nanotechnology: Economic, Societal, and Institutional Impact” (not on web, as far as I can tell). This was the result of a meeting sponsored by the U.S. ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on January 15, 2007
  • Now you can nominate nanotechnology as Grand Challenge

    The U.S. National Academy of Engineering is requesting your input on Grand Challenges for Engineering over the next 100 years. This being Nanodot, we hope you’ll nominate nanotechnology. It’s a serious effort funded by $500,000 from NSF. From the MSNBC coverage: The comments will be winnowed down, then reviewed by an 18-member ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on January 11, 2007
  • Nanotechnology: eleven 50-year outlooks

    The Institute for the Future, in a UK-funded study published on the Stanford website, presents eleven outlooks for nanotechnology over the next 50 years: • Better drug delivery through nanotechnology • Carbon nanotubes and lighter vehicles • The coming nanoshell revolution in oncology • The dream of biochemical nanocomputing • ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on December 29, 2006
  • Sensible Swiss views on nanotechnology benefits, downsides

    Switzerland’s Centre for Technology Assessment has issued its report Public Reactions to Nanotechnology in Switzerland (428 KB pdf), and — not surprisingly — it’s relatively balanced. From page 33 (page 35 of pdf file): “There’s a good and a bad side to everything” — This saying sums up quite well the way that the ...
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on December 22, 2006
  • Nanotechnology for cognitive enhancement: okay or not

    Cognitive enhancement technologies already exist — if you drink coffee, you’re a user — so it seems likely that nanotechnology will eventually be used for this purpose. A new report (pdf) from the Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes at ASU summarizes the results of a workshop on this topic held with Sandia. [...]
    Posted to News (Weblog) by Anonymous on December 11, 2006
1 2 Next >
Advertise | Help | Contact | About | Terms | Privacy | Copyright © 2007 Betterhumans | Powered by Community Server | Partners:
World Transhumanist Association Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Immortality Institute Methuselah Mouse Prize Foresight Institute Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Lifeboat Foundation