in Search
0 members online
Immortality

Simon

Cindy Jackson: Cosmetic enhancement queen

I thought that I knew a lot about cosmetic enhancement. I've written in its defence and, with my day job, have leading clients in the industry, and contacts at cosmetic enhancement magazines. But for some reason, I'd never heard of Cindy Jackson until speaking today with someone who is making a documentary on the history of plastic surgery. I'm glad I learned of her existence: She's the queen of cosmetic enhancement, blazing a controversial and fascinating trail to become more attractive--way more attractive--with age.

Jackson (pictured at right; there are better pictures on her website, but as a magazine cover, this one is fair use for journalistic purposes) has demonstrated that modern technology allows most people, with the right plan, to be beautiful. While some might argue that the beauty she has attained is the mainstream ideal of beauty, that's beside the point. What she's really shown is that modern technology has made the human body malleable enough that we can pretty much look however we like (within reason, of course--we can't yet have functional wings, for example).

While some might dismiss Jackson as equal to her last-namesake, Michael, that would also be missing the point. Ms Jackson is not a reclusive star who has achieved infamy for her plastic surgery experimentation. She is a smart, purposeful star who has planned her cosmetic improvement and rise to fame with careful detail. She says: "Applying the principles of beauty I learned as an art student, including centuries-old rules of facial and body proportion, along with some basic anthropological laws of human attraction, I drew up a plan." Her plan involved a wish list, and continuing improvements in technology have allowed her to tick off each item. So much so that Jackson, who started her project in 1988, now looks far younger than she did in the 1970s.

I know that many people don't (yet) share my enthusiasm for how technology can empower people to take control of their appearance. But in my mind, it levels the playing field. Beauty offers tremendous advantages, and simply telling people that it's only skin deep doesn't help. A world full of smart, compassionate people would be fantastic. A world full of smart, compassionate, pretty people would be even better.

Jackson has also shown how cosmetic enhancement technology is blurring the virtual and real worlds. As computer-generated humans begin to look more and more real, allowing virtually unlimited expressions of beauty, cosmetic enhancement technology is allowing physical humans to alter their appearance with similar degrees of flexibility. As that technology continues to improve, the possibilities will only increase, perhaps to the point where we can change our appearance as often as we change outfits.
Published Tuesday, May 09, 2006 9:05 PM by Simon
Tags:

Comment Notification

Join or sign in to track comments

Comments

 

dagon wrote on May 9, 2006 11:16 PM

Plastic surgery is still brutal and unpleasant. Do not think otherwise. The treatment itself is akin to extremel physical abuse and some people only do it because they get heavy sedation with morphine analogs. I've seen plastic surgery subjects up close and they do not look attractive; rather plastic surgery creates a better (smooth) canvas for make-up to create the illusion of youth and beauty. Those who've had plastic surgery I've seen really up-close look leathery, have hard textures below the skin and personally I found the effect to be repugnant.

I agree that it's better than the alternative: maintain a delicate illusion of youth rather than look old. Aging is a severe affliction and even looking old has a horrible social stigma. Right now the aging still get a residual respect from their fellow humans, but as baby boomers age I bet they'll get their share of overpopulation-related discrimination. I expect the first largescale old people killings to take place in europe and america within a few years. Ofcourse those will be poor and old, suffering from another stigma altogether.

Appearing to be strong and/or desireable is the crux here. If you aren't you aren't a consumption article in this world and you are to some extent perceived as surplus, ballast. And that'll get worse - untill we can somehow create abundance and really cure afflictions such as aging.
 

Mr. Farlops wrote on May 10, 2006 1:41 AM

I have to agree with Dagon on this: From the cell's prospective, current cosmetic technology is horrifically brutal and traumatic.

I look in certain news periodicals geared towards yuppies in their thirties and the number of ads for cosmetic surgery clinics is astounding. There are a lot of worried and depressed people out there who want to look, younger, slimmer, more European and more symmetrical than they are.

The procedures these ads tout as innovations still make me cringe and wince. Even as a self-described transhumanist, I want no part of it. It's still just too primative.

But it will get better one day.

One of the great things about the end stage in the evolution of these cosmetic technologies is that one day they'll finally eliminate that lever used by marketing weasels around the world: the secret fear that you're not pretty enough.

When changing your physiognomy and somatype is as easy, complete and perfect as changing clothes and entire marketing angle will collapse and good riddance!
 

Mr. Farlops wrote on May 10, 2006 1:44 AM

Of course this still leaves other marketing angles to exploit.

And somepeople will have a hard time dealing with the truth that even if they are pretty on the outside, they're still ugly on the inside.
 

dagon wrote on May 10, 2006 10:34 AM

Farlops, don't you think it's great to screw someone once (and briefly) who is beautiful on the outside (and ugly on the inside) and them dump her (or him) soon after ?

It's evolution in action.
 

V wrote on May 10, 2006 6:36 PM

I remember seeing a television news program about her at my parents home and my mother remarked, "what good will all that cosmetic surgery do her, because she is still going to get old!"  I think my mom brought up an excellent point, especially considering she is not a Transhumanist.  

I do believe cosmetic surgery for the here and now should be an option for people, but the real "surgery" needs to be done at the genetic level so the work is not merely a feeble attempt at holding off the inevitable.

Natasha Vita-More, the prominent Transhumanist leader, has used a combination of physical exercise, diet and cosmetic surgery to stave off the effects of aging to the best of her ability.  Kat Cotter, formerly married to investor David Kekich, is also an example of someone who looks years younger than she actually is.  I realize they are involved in an uphill battle but hopefully the "bridge theory" will work for them so they can eventually climb the ladder to indefinite lifespan.  

I like the expression, "I'm going to outlive the hell out of you!" lol  But of course aging should ideally not be a contest with winners and losers (though in many ways it is).  

Best,

John      
 

Mr. Farlops wrote on May 10, 2006 7:38 PM

I don't mean to dismiss Simon's direct or indirect points that trying to look better can be very good for you.

Care in your appearance means you try to live healthier, gives you self-confidence and necessary pride. Taking care in your appearance does indicate mental health and strength. It gives you some internal discipline that can drive ambitions in other areas of your life. That's all fine.

And I'll be very glad when this stuff becomes so commonplace and easy that people can't use physical appearance as a lever anymore. I'll be so glad when advertisers can't use pretty guys and gals to sell us beer and cars anymore. Society needs to transcend the pettiness of high school.

I think it's great that people can treat their own bodies as artistic mediums to express themselves in. People, the body modifiers, already are exploring non-human appearances. That's really interesting. I'd explore it myself if the technology was more advanced and reversable. I'd like a pelt that supported animation, like a display. But right now, let others more into this stuff than I break the trail.

Often I'm too quick to dismiss the positive aspects of these trends. In retrospect my second post was a cheap shot. I'm just saying, like everything else in life, it's all a fine balance.

And these technologies are only going to get better and better. There is no denying that.

Anyway in answer to Dagon's question, nah, I don't think I could be that vindictive. Why mistreat someone else? If I was just into simple gratification, I'd just rent a sexbot.
 

advancedatheist wrote on May 10, 2006 10:23 PM

About 10-12 years ago the A&E cable network ran a documentary on the theme of "human transformations," featuring at the one extreme Cindy Jackson, and at the other extreme a guy who wanted to live like the fictional characters on Star Trek.

Both of these people struck me as having emotional problems, but I came away from the show respecting Cindy more than the Trekkie. We don't have a real Starfleet Academy for the Trekkie to attend, but Cindy Jackson could leave her unsatisfying life in rural Ohio, move to London and get cosmetic surgery to look approximately like her Barbie doll. And, in courtesan fashion, she could capitalize on her improved looks to work her way into fashionable London society and meet the kinds of "glamorous" people housewives in America can only experience through soap operas and romance novels. I suspect Cindy will realize eventually, if she hasn't already, that her efforts will turn to ashes as she ages -- but at least she exerted herself to do something arguably more real than people who try to live like the characters in their favorite science fiction stories (and I do mean some transhumanists, though not necessarily all).
 

advancedatheist wrote on May 10, 2006 11:27 PM

"A world full of smart, compassionate people would be fantastic. A world full of smart, compassionate, pretty people would be even better."

Given how "beauty" arose through sexual selection to telegraph reproductive fitness, I wonder about the consequences of artificially increasing the incidence of false fitness signals through cosmetic procedures.

BTW, "compassion" seems over-rated to me. I feel Aspergerish enough these days that I don't want to have to feel other people's pain. It proves too much of a nuisance, and I'd rather not have to try to cognitively process the social cues.
 

Anne wrote on May 11, 2006 12:41 AM

Right now, with present technology, cosmetic surgery is a rather expensive and physically traumatic process.  But it is not very difficult to conceive of a future wherein changing one's physical appearance will be as simple and clean as changing the attributes of one's avatar in a video game, or online.  I truly think that is the road we're headed down -- just looking at the popularity of such things as plastic surgery and body modification, it is absolutely apparent that human beings, by and large, have a tremendous desire to be able to customize their personal appearance.

I'm not overly worried about the "emotional problems" aspect of people who might get plastic surgery on account of insecurity -- this is by far not the most common reaction to insecurity, nor would ideologically opposing cosmetic surgery somehow make people less insecure.  Being "enslaved" by media images of beauty seems, by and large, to be something of a choice.  

I'm not a classic media beauty, but I am confident enough in my appearance not to feel the need to actually change my facial structure.  Nothing is grossly out of proportion and I'm not riddled with acne scars or anything like that.  I would like to look "young" forever -- but only if it means I actually AM in a state of arrested aging.  I do think that there is beauty in human diversity, but the visible signs of aging -- wrinkles, sagging, etc. -- are actually signs of <i>damage</i>.  And I'm all for stopping and reversing the damage in the first place.  It's always seemed a bit silly, also, when people get face lifts and other treatments that end up making them look much worse.  Cindy Jackson actually looks good.  Michael Jackson, on the other hand, looks like he belongs in a circus!

Playing with appearance can be fun.  I'm not into body modification or piercings, but I do like dyeing my hair blue or green.  I'm firmly convinced that blue and green are extremely attractive hair colors, and it would be awesome if I could have some way to make my hair grow out that color!
Join or sign in to post a comment
Submit

About Simon

I aim to understand, apply and develop science, technology and communications to achieve positive change. To this end, I am the owner and operator of Betterhumans, which I founded in 2002. I also work in interactive healthcare marketing, helping pharmaceutical and other healthcare organizations effectively use interactive technologies. Currently, I'm also working part-time on a masters degree at the University of Toronto in the history and philosophy of science and technology.
Advertise | Help | Contact | About | Terms | Privacy | Copyright © 2007 Betterhumans | Powered by Community Server | Partners:
World Transhumanist Association Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Immortality Institute Methuselah Mouse Prize Foresight Institute Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Lifeboat Foundation