in Search
0 members online
Immortality

Michael Anissimov

Solutions to Overpopulation

Yesterday I wrote on my blog about how the earth can support 100 billion people, at least: http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/michael/blog/?p=174 "The United States has about 10,000,000 km² of land. The average population density is 30/km². The earth as a whole has about 150,000,000 km² of land and 350,000,000 km² of water, for a total area of roughly 500,000,000 km². The average population density on land is 40/km²." Let me know what you think...
Published Tuesday, September 12, 2006 7:32 PM by Michael Anissimov

Comment Notification

Join or sign in to track comments

Comments

 

krrkrr wrote on September 13, 2006 6:26 PM

You've overlooked cultured meats, which has the potential to radically change how we use the arable land. If we can create the majority of meats in a lab, we can stop the wasteful practice of keeping livestock. I'm unsure how big the energy-loss when using farmland to create a growth culture for the meats, but i'm pretty sure it's vastly more effective since you don't have to power the entire animal for several years to reap the results.

Otherwise a great post. Overpopulation has always been a moot point in my book, coming from a country with a population density of 12/sq km, and a county with 2/sq km.

 

aldersondrive2007 wrote on September 16, 2006 5:48 PM

Well, my grandfather who was a Berry Goldwater conservative, non the less spoke of the population problem from a quality of life perspective. Like when driving to Santa Monica from Pasadena California was almost always a pleasant venture in 1946 or so, and a nightmare in 1991 ( the last time I did it).

The idea that because there is open land that we can just pave over it is not totally valid. I want to see open space on this planet.

But, the above being said, we see some of the best news in over 12,000 years! Birth rates are down in most industrial societies, and even nose diving in Germany, most of the former Warsaw Block nations, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and beginning to drop just above replacement rates in Thailand, Brazil ect.

Isn't it wonderful that just about the time radical life extension becomes a reasonable prospect, the culture transforms in such a way as to make it socially disirable in the same societies that are most likely to have extended health span.

Of course, I mentioned on other threads that the trend will get even better because of the fact children are not a capital asset but a financial liability.

Oh, and by the way guys, a really bad investment here in the States because you almost always have to pay for it if there is a divorce.LOL!

Years ago, back when Tom Leykis was on KFI 640 A.M. (amplitude modulation medium wave commercial broadcast band) a gentleman called in saying that he discovered an investment that cost only $600.00 and resulted in a $250,000.00 capital gain in the 20 years that followed.

What was it?

A vasectomy.

 

spindizzy wrote on April 27, 2007 1:15 PM

"Isn't it wonderful that just about the time radical life extension becomes a reasonable prospect, the culture transforms in such a way as to make it socially disirable in the same societies that are most likely to have extended health span."

Contraception does not reduce birth rates. It simply selects in favour of those who can not or will not use it.

When you consider who those people are, I think the urgency of radical life extension becomes rather obvious.

Join or sign in to post a comment
Submit

Syndication

This Blog

Top Tags

No tags have been created or used yet.
Advertise | Help | Contact | About | Terms | Privacy | Copyright © 2007 Betterhumans | Powered by Community Server | Partners:
World Transhumanist Association Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Immortality Institute Methuselah Mouse Prize Foresight Institute Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Lifeboat Foundation