
Martine Rothblatt has an interesting idea. Unfortunately, I don't think her idea is going to work.
In
our cybernetic and virtual world of the future, says Rothblatt, genes
are not going to matter so much. Instead, we’ll be concerned about
‘bemes' -- a fundamental, transmissible, unit of beingness.
This
will give rise to the transbeman person -- a being who claims to have
the rights and obligations associated with being human, but is beyond
accepted notions of legal personhood. Examples would include a computer
claiming to be conscious; a person successfully reanimated from cryonic
stasis; or the downloading of a ‘cyberconsciousness’ into a highly
engineered ‘bionano’ body.
Operation: Mindfile
Rothblatt, an eccentric billionaire lawyer, author, and entrepreneur, made the case for "Cybernetic Biostasis" during
TransVision 2007 and
argued that bemes will eventually become the currency of the future –
the stuff that will help prospective persons restore their memories and
sense of identity. She believes that people should create digital
‘mindfiles’ that chronicle their lives; eventually, after death,
persons could be revived by means of ‘mindware’ transfer when the
requisite technology is powerful enough (namely the advent of
artificial intelligence).
According to Rothblatt, bemes can be
virtually anything that could later be used to restore a person’s
history, identity and tendencies. Bemetic mindfiles could be comprised
of old photos, blogs, transcripts, diaries, and so on; these artifacts
could later be used to restore and re-define a person’s personality
(including mannerisms, feelings, beliefs, attitudes and values). Most
importantly, these files could restore a person's memory.
To this end, Rothblatt has created the websites
Cyberev.org (short for ybernetic beingness revival) and
Lifenaut.com. People are encouraged to use the sites to start chronicling their lives.
During
her TV07 presentation Rothblatt admitted that piecing together odds and
sods of data would not create a perfect copy of a person’s
consciousness. She contended that most people only remember fragments
of their past anyway. To Rothblatt, it’s the preservation of the
person’s "essence" that’s important.
Memories are a strange thingI
find Rothblatt’s mindfile concept quite intriguing, but ultimately
unsatisfactory. I’m not convinced that a person’s identity and sense of
ongoing self can be re-instantiated in this way. At best we might get a
twisted copy of ourselves with a haphazard sense of someone else’s past.
Memories
are a tricky thing; they don’t exist in a vacuum. First, we have
memories because we, as conscious observers, experience the events in
real time. Based on the strength and uniqueness of the event our brain
parses the experience and temporarily stores it into short term memory.
From there it solidifies into our long-term memory where we build an
association with the event. This association allows us to recall the
event at will. We are able to access the memory because we a)
experienced the event first hand, and we b) created a personal linkage
to that event (what could also be referred to as a personal narrative).
In other words, you have to know that you
have the memory in order to access it.
Sometimes
we forget that we have a memory of an event only to be reminded that it
still exists in the brain just waiting to be accessed. I love it when
that happens. My first few thoughts are usually, “Why did I forget
about that? Why did I not think about that for so long?” For what ever
reason the association or linkage to that piece of data was lost. The
memory was still there embedded in the mind, but it was simply not
accessed enough causing it to lie dormant.
As for Rothblatt’s
concept, just because a mind is infused with memories doesn’t mean that
all the associations will be there. The memories would likely be
construed as a random mess of images, words and events. It would be
unlikely that the person would be able to make any sense of it at all
and frame a personal narrative around it.
Consciousness, identity, and an ongoing sense of selfFar
too many people at the WTA’s TransVision conference batted around the
word “consciousness” with complete disregard for definitions and a
concrete understanding of what it truly is. Consciousness all too often
gets conflated with other aspects of the mind, including memory and
other cognitive tasks that comprise the mechanistic or computational
aspects of the brain.
Consciousness is not something you can
piece together and instantiate with cultural artifacts. Nor can a
continuity of consciousness be restored in this manner. That’s still a
question that perplexes even the best philosophers and neuroscientists.
Here’s
a thought experiment: let’s suppose that you traded memories with your
best friend – nothing else, just the memories. You’ve still got your
body and all the grey matter in your brain that rightfully belongs to
you, except your memories. Does this mean that you and your friend have
traded consciousnesses? Does it mean that you’ve uploaded yourself into
your friend's brain and vice-versa?
The answer is no to both
questions! You would still be you in the sense that you’re still
observing reality, but you’d be convinced that you are now your friend.
A
sense of identity (sense
being the key word -- a kind of illusion) may have been transferred,
but not the conscious lens that each of us has with which we observe
and experience the world.
No link to cryonic reanimationLater, when
Alcor’s
Tanya Jones was
answering questions after her cryonics presentation, a member of the
audience asked her if Alcor would consider using the mindfile concept
to help in the process of reanimating frozen patients.
Jones answered very clearly: no.
Elaborating,
she said that Alcor has considered using mindfiles to help newly
revived persons re-connect with their past life. In this sense, the
mindfiles would be a glorified shoebox filled with an individual's
personal effects.
This makes sense. Assuming that a person’s
brain was properly preserved they should have no trouble accessing
their memories. If all goes well the person should feel like they had a
long and hard nap. A very, very hard nap. Their memories, along with
the all important personal narrative, associations and ongoing
identity, should be readily accessible.
The mindfile as restorative medicineRothblatt’s
mindfile concept may have limitations in regards to uploading or
restoring a consciousness, but it is far from useless. The short-term
potential as a means for restorative medicine is certainly a
possibility.
Alzheimer’s patients may have their memories
re-invigorated and stimulated in the manner that Rothblatt describes.
They could also be used to improve the human capacity for memory, which
can be extraordinarily weak.
Looking ahead, there's also the
possibility that mindfiles could be used as a supplement to naturally
stored memories. They could be uploaded into the mind and used in
tandem with other recollections to add width and breadth to memory much
like photographs or home videos do today.
So, you may wish to visit Dr. Rothblatt's website after all. Start working on that mindfile!