in Search
0 members online
Immortality

George

I’ve seen the future and the future is bald

Natalie Portman’s recent performance in V for Vendetta has me thinking about bald women on the silver screen, particularly in science fiction movies.

Traditional films are quite conservative in the way they portray women’s hairstyles. As an indelible part of their sexuality, filmmakers have been reluctant to mess around with such an integral female attribute. Moreover, until fairly recently, female roles in action movies have been secondary to those of males. Men are supposed to be masculinized on screen and women feminized.

Obviously, in today’s supposed equal opportunity action film industry we now have our super-sexualized action hero females like Charlie’s Angels and Uma Thurman in Kill Bill. But let’s face it -- they’re still sex symbols, big hair and all.

It would seem, then, that the only way to de-sexualize a female hero is to have her shave her head. And in this sense, science fiction has led the way.

Sci-fi is a particularly powerful genre in that it can afford to be more experimental in its treatment of virtually any aspect that appears on screen. In science fiction, the weirder the better. And it only makes sense. When you’re trying to portray the future or otherworldliness, it helps to cross traditional boundaries.

In sci-fi films, bald women have conveyed a number of things in addition to desexualization, including masculinity, sexual ambiguity, dehumanization, youthfulness, and innocence. And paradoxically, bald women have also been used to portray an enhanced sense of sexuality and control.

Sigourney Weaver, for example, went bald in Aliens in a blatant show of female masculinity. Like Demi Moore in G.I. Jane, Weaver was better able to portray Ripley as a physical and tormented action hero without having to carry the baggage of female sexuality. Consequently, a strong case can be made that Ripley is one of the most believable female action characters yet realized in science fiction film. Another recent example of this, of course, is Natalie Portman’s portrayal of Evey Hammond in V for Vendetta.

Along these lines, strong bald female characters tend to have an undeniable ‘butchy’ aspect to them. Put a bald actress on screen with a gun in her hand and suddenly you have a character whose sexual orientation is ambiguous at best.

Baldness can also represent something that has been taken away from us against our will, including our very humanity. In George Lucas’s THX 1138, for example, many of the main actors, including Maggie McOmie, were told to shave their heads in order to emphasize the dehumanizing nature of a future dystopian world.

Going back to 1927, the robot of Metropolis was sexually female, metallic, and bald. At least, that’s how we knew her to be on the inside; the robot is eventually given true human form and becomes an exotic dancer in the city's nightclubs, fomenting discord amongst the rich young men of Metropolis. But we, the viewer, know what bald malevolence lurks underneath.

As shown in Metropolis, baldness can represent sexual control in a non-intuitive way. David Lynch’s version of Dune portrayed the women of the Bene Gesserit order with shaved heads, perhaps to convey their eerie power and strength (including their sexual prowess), and even possibly their aloofness towards the male gender.

Similarly, in Star Trek: The Motion Picture, Persis Khambatta portrayed the Deltan Ilia, a bald species that can exude pheromones to arouse human males.

With the Bene Gesserit and Ilia, these female characters are at once desexualized by their baldness, but by consequence have their very sexuality brought to the fore and accentuated – elements that are reinforced even further by their actions and overt sexuality. In a real sense, these women have become more sexually frightening and threatening by virtue of their shaved heads.

And finally, in Steven Spielberg’s version of Minority Report, Samantha Morton played a Precog that was able to predict certain future events. These characters had a certain purity and innocence about them – elements that were emphasized by portraying them without hair. As a result, Spielberg was able to give them a sort of youthfulness and naiveté.

Truth, of course, can be stranger than fiction. Or rather, the future will be stranger than fiction. Given Donna Haraway’s call for female liberation through cyborg form, the desexualization of women may not just be an artistic device, but a true real world phenomenon.

For the time being, however, we’ll have to settle for Natalie Portman; but that's okay, because bald never looked so cute.

Cross-posted from Sentient Developments.
Published Sunday, April 16, 2006 1:23 PM by George

Comment Notification

Join or sign in to track comments

Comments

 

Cybert wrote on April 16, 2006 2:46 PM

What comes to mind to me is the film Powder. It's a male character, however. Lots of interesting transhuman elements there.
 

Mr. Farlops wrote on April 16, 2006 4:30 PM

Of course let's not forget Sinéad O'Connor. I think this can be traced back to the early punk rock and new wave era. Once Wendy O and Annabella Lwin confronted the mainstream with mohawks it was anything goes for women's hairstyles. The rise of the *** rights and awareness movement may have also had something to do with it.

I don't know what it is that makes movie makers think that the future is full of concentration and boot camp rejects. I think it has to do with visually informing us that this is a dark, oppressive future where people can't afford or aren't allowed flashy hairstyles.

But putting science fiction movies aside for a moment, I notice that white men of my generation, say between 1958 to 1965, perhaps influenced by punk rock, perhaps making a vague common cause with the chemotherapy of AIDS patients, perhaps copying Patrick Stewart, have taken a strong attachment to baldness.

I think this was the last cool thing they decided they could do when their bald spots became obvious. Black men on the other hand seem to have been into the baldness thing for much longer, Lou Gosset Jr., Issac Hayes and so on.

I myself am bald, very closely cropped and greying with the typical "horseshoe shape." I tend to shave the front of my skull to maintain this symmetry. I guess this is just me giving up and being honest about it. I'd sooner die than wear toup or do a comb-over. In this era of minoxidil, maybe men of my generation just really don't give a damn anymore.

Maybe that's what the future is about. Not giving a damn about the surface detail anymore. This makes sense because it's getting easier and easier to manipulate. This reduces its power.
 

Mr. Farlops wrote on April 16, 2006 4:33 PM

By the way, that censored portion was meant to say "l-e-s-b-i-a-n."
 

V wrote on April 16, 2006 6:28 PM

George,

Ummm..., you forgot to include a photo of yourself! : )

Best wishes,

John

P.S. As I teen watching Star Trek: The Motion Picture, I thought Persis Khambatta embodied feminine beauty like no other women I had ever seen (except for Sophia Loren of course).
 

Entity wrote on April 18, 2006 6:56 AM

My wife is bald, because she likes her hair, or the absence of it, that way. I'm bald, because my genes told my scalp to shed my mane, before that happened I used to have longer hair than my most of the women I know.
Because of my long hair I was often called homosexual, because my wife has no hair she is often called ***. This is something I don't understand, why people get so worked up when somerthing crosses their idea of what a man or a woman should or should not look like, and what on earth makes them think that the sexuality of others than their own -- and their possible mates -- is any of their business anyway.

This is, in my opinnion, one thing people should really think for a while, so the good intentions of creating new better future and actual actions and attitudes keep up with each other, so that when the time comes, when changes are inevitable, people can actually go trough them. If we think and act like we would still live in the stone age, we will never gain the momentum to really ascent from it.

Sex (or the lack of it) and sexuality are an important part of human life. People who can dictate on to others the "right" way to be a man, or the right way to be a woman and the right way to express love, or to seek pleasure actually define quite a lot of what is the right way to be human. When sexuality is controlled, wether by law or tabu, people are controlled, and the control becames part of what defines us humans as part of some culture we form together.

So the images that define sexuality might actually define a  lot more than just what sort of a face/other assets you should look for when in search of a mate. They define who we are, and who controls us and how we control ourselves. This is something anyone can do: mess with imagenary, find out yourselves is resistance really that futile after all.

I don't speak for tolerance, I wish to provoke understanding. I would like to see, that at the advent of singularity (is Kurzweil is to be believed) people would at least learn not to worry if they are having a bad hair day when it arrives.
 

grahamwolf wrote on April 18, 2006 10:06 AM

***
 

grahamwolf wrote on April 18, 2006 10:08 AM

Why is the "L-word" censored?

Great article, George, BTW
 

Best Pheromones, Dating Tips On Flirting, Attract Women, Attract Men (Trackback) wrote on April 12, 2008 2:20 AM

So don\'t get down on your pheromones, they don\'t hate you. Your pheromones are actually loving you right now! If it was up to your lonely- mones, you\'d be waking up in scummy boy bed, bong water spilled on the sheets, dog licking your face and a dirty

Join or sign in to post a comment
Submit

About George

Canada's leading futurist, activist and award winning blogger, George has written and spoken extensively about the impacts of cutting-edge science and technology. He is the Director of Operations for Commune Media, an advertising and marketing firm that specializes in marketing science. George has more than 10 years' experience in media, arts and communications. With relationships forged across several continents, he has managed international accounts for leading brands. In addition to his work with Commune, George is currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. He is the co-founder and president of the Toronto Transhumanist Association and has served on the Board of Directors for the World Transhumanist Association. George has been interviewed by such publications as The Guardian, the BBC, Radio Free Europe, and Beliefnet. He made an appearance on the CBC's The Hour and has been profiled in NOW and This Magazine.
Advertise | Help | Contact | About | Terms | Privacy | Copyright © 2007 Betterhumans | Powered by Community Server | Partners:
World Transhumanist Association Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Immortality Institute Methuselah Mouse Prize Foresight Institute Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Lifeboat Foundation