in Search
0 members online

George

The end of livestock

The science of tissue engineering and the development of in vitro meat may one day, hopefully, result in the end of livestock.

And with it, the end of unnecessary cruelty to non-human animals, a decrease in the frequency of animal-to-human borne diseases (which is like, all of them), the alleviation of environmental degradation caused by animal farming, and an end to unhealthy, unclean, hormone-ridden and antibiotic laden meat.

Humans eat 240 billion kilograms of meat every year. Imagine how many animals that represents. Now imagine each of those lifetimes as they are individually experienced: caged, crammed, frightened, diseased, poked, prodded, neurotic, psychotic, and all followed by slaughter. Don’t think so? Read this, this, this, this, and this. And then watch this.

Then there’s all the cropland, water, fertilizer, pesticides and energy required to produce animals for the killing floor. And what about the millions of tonnes of manure and other waste produced every year in North America?

As Jared Diamond noted in Guns, Germs, and Steel, humans have been consistently traumatized by the continual spread of diseases, which in virtually every case has been spawned by human-to-animal contact (predominantly the result of maintaining livestock). Current health and pandemic risks such as mad cow and avian flu are all heightened as a consequence of animal farming.

Moreover, with the introduction of in vitro foods, in vitro meat products would be far healthier than the real thing. Cultivated meats would be engineered to be healthier and cleaner.

In vitro meat is still meat in every sense of the term. According to Wikipedia, the process is as follows:
Meat essentially consists of animal muscle. There are loosely two approaches for production of in vitro meat; loose muscle cells and structured muscle, the latter one being vastly more challenging than the former. Muscles consist of muscle fibers, long cells with multiple nuclei. They don't proliferate by themselves, but arise when precursor cells fuse. Precursor cells can be embryonic stem cells or satellite cells, specialized stem cells in muscle tissue. Theoretically, they can relatively simple be cultured in a bioreactor and then later made to fuse. For the growth of real muscle however, the cells should grow "on the spot", which requires a perfusion system akin to a blood supply to deliver nutrients and oxygen close to the growing cells, as well as remove the waste products. In addition other cell types need to be grown like adipocytes, and chemical messengers should provide clues to the growing tissue about the structure. Lastly, muscle tissue needs to be trained to properly develop.
In vitro meat, referred to by some as laboratory-grown meat, is animal flesh that has never been part of a complete, living animal.

According to a recent Globe and Mail article, scientists can grow frog and mouse meat in the lab, and are now working on pork, beef and chicken. Their goal is to develop an industrial version of the process in five years. It will be at that point that we can say a viable threat exists to the ongoing presence of animal farming. And at the very least it will certainly make the presence of livestock that much less justifiable.

That being said, it will be a struggle to convince people to eat synthetic meat over the real thing. Most people who have ethical issues with eating meat are already vegetarians--so devout meat eaters aren’t really listening. And it’s doubtful that die-hards will give up their tried-and-true meat over an artificial and likely inferior-tasting product.

Perhaps it’ll take the death of millions and millions of people from avian flu for people to start questioning meat eating culture.

One last thought: if there are any arguments from anybody that in vitro meat is still somehow unethical or demeaning to an animal, they seriously need to rethink things. A chunk of tissue grown in a petri dish is as far removed from an existential, emotional, and conscious creature as is a rock.

That being said, I can already hear the howls of outrage...

Cross-posted from Sentient Developments.
Published Friday, March 31, 2006 7:52 PM by George

Comment Notification

Join or sign in to track comments

Comments

 

mitkat wrote on March 31, 2006 8:13 PM

Those howls of outrage would be fairly unfounded and uninformed, I would think. As a vegetarian of almost ten years, I'm not the most unbiased person to comment, but meat production on a whole has a generally negative effect on humanity in many, many ways. With the introduction of in vitro meat, a lot of those ills will be remedied (ecological and environmental harm to the globe, biological self-harm on a human scale) and more resources can be allocated to other more worthwhile efforts.
 

Mr. Farlops wrote on April 1, 2006 10:59 AM

There is an economic issue too. If the food industry discovers something cheaper than meat yet mostly the same as meat, would it be surprising if they save a buck and go with the cultured meat? If McDonalds can sell us hamburgers that taste and feel essentially the same in the mouths of consumers yet which cost less, do you think they'll stick with real cows?

Consumer advocates will probably demand labeling and this will probably lead to a stratification. At the high end, Kobe beef from real cows bathed in beer and babied by attendants and the low end, with those nitrite-laden jerked meatoid substances you find in convenience stores and ball parks.

Go to a fancy restaraunt and they'll give you real pate and real swordfish. Buy a hot dog and almost certainly it will be cultured meat and lots of textured vegatable protein. People already buy cheap "sushi" with synthetic crabmeat made from pollock.

Because of there is a huge market for cheap, low quality foodstuffs, I don't there is any danger that this stuff won't be adopted.
 

CP wrote on April 1, 2006 2:17 PM

Are we going to have to let domesticated farm animals become extinct because they can't live without us and are no longer useful?

I'm in favor of cloned meat, I'm just considering what inane hassles will arise.
 

George wrote on April 1, 2006 3:55 PM

Yes, as a matter of fact we are talking about the extinction of farm animals. Given the reasons for their existence and their squalid conditions, farm animals have what is referred to as a 'wrongful life.' Life is not justifiable simply for life's sake; it is immoral to bring conscious beings into existence simply for them to be our slaves or to be the food on our plates--certainly not in today's day in age.
 

CP wrote on April 2, 2006 9:59 AM

We are responsible for domestic animals because in a sense they are the first artificial life forms we created.
I'd be happy to rely on in vitro meat -- I seldom eat meat because it's expensive and too much trouble to cook, not for any moral considerations, and that would continue -- but I'm not too happy about killing off remaining livestock.
Some animals are simply nice to have around. Except for primates (which are not nice to have around, though breeding and genetic engineering can change that) they haven't got the slightest notion of slavery or how or why they are in the situation they are in or of any larger implications of their lives. They simply take it for granted. Having some sheep in your yard isn't the same as owning humans and forcing them to do hard labor so you can prosper. Sheep are conscious but they don't know diddly (I worked with them in a medical lab for some time.) Giving domestic animals a nice life and proper care and receiving pleasant feelings while doing so is not a bad thing.
Let's not descend to the idiotic level of the animal activist whose tract I read who said it was terrible to say "Good boy/girl" to an adult dog since it humiliated them because slaves were "boy" and "girl" till they reached upper middle age. What dog could possibly know -- or care -- about that? They take anything that sounds pleasant as positive reinforcement.
 

George wrote on April 2, 2006 10:56 AM

>but I'm not too happy about killing off remaining livestock.

I'm not talking about killing off remaining livestock (although, that's their eventually fate, anyway, isn't it?). I don't think new farm animals should be brought into existence in the first place.
 

Mr. Farlops wrote on April 3, 2006 5:43 AM

Irrelevencies aside, CP raises an interesting point.

There are already projects now to have gene banks store and save tissue samples to preserve biodiversity of food crops. There is a real danger now that the thousand or so varieties of Andean potatoes will be lost as foreign varieties  are shipped in to be cultivated for agribusiness.

Maybe after we let the cattle, swine and poultry go wild again, we can just save the genes from the domesticated versions. It should be a relative easy matter to recreate Holsteins, Angus and Rhode Island Reds if we have to.

Personally I think CP is worried about nothing. There will probably always be some hoity-toity small scale, free-range, mom and pop organic farms out there for the people who can afford that stuff. This in addition to gene banking the old domestics, should let us retain that information.

But I agree factory farms should go. They were necessary once but if they can be replaced with something more humane and more environmentally sound, they should go.
 

CP wrote on April 3, 2006 2:26 PM

I'm sure there will be effete clubs of perverts who take delight in paying enormous sums to watch animals be slaughtered and prepared (and some who feel it's best to be "natural") just as there are people now willing to pay fortunes to eat gorilla and chimpanzee because they are close to human and endangered.
However, aside from eating them, these creatures are capable of living with and interacting socially with humans due to millenia of doing so and being selected to. While I wouldn't want a bull sauntering about my yard, sheep would be alright, especially since they could also cut and fertilize my yard. No need to throw out the good with the bad.
I am in favor of cloned meat and the closing down of factory farms and, for that matter, slaughterhouses.
The problem, as always, is the fanatics who will go to extremes.
 

Mr. Farlops wrote on April 3, 2006 4:44 PM

CP,

It is also likely that there will be people who feel roughly as you do and who will keep and preserve farming as hobby (A rather expensive one.). They may keep domestic farm animals as pets only, never eating them, never selling them except among likeminded hobbyists, never rendering them into leather, glue or gelatin. They do this simply for the interest and joy in that lifestyle.

I actually have some friends who do this sort of thing now (But they eat the chickens and tomatoes. Haven't eaten their two turkeys though.). Their farm is small and not really economically viable but that's not why they do it. They just enjoy that life.

These likeminded folks might have have annual historical preservation gatherings, open to the public, sort like traditional carpenters, blacksmiths and historical recreation societies do now.

And as I said there will be the high end food market where everything is done traditionally. We already have organic foods being sold now. These are slightly more expensive than mainstream food products but, they demonstrate that there is a viable market for them.

But I'm repeating myself.
 

CP wrote on April 4, 2006 1:22 PM

That sounds about right, as long as there isn't some over powerful government set up by the lunatic fringe. But actually slaughtering animals for food might be regarded much as human sacrifice is (until a case reaches the US Supreme Court, which will approve human sacrifice).

I don't exactly have traditional reasons, I just happen to like animals, as do a lot of people. I can also make animals happy by taking proper care of them, which is something that can't be done with humans, and enable them to live long contented lives, longer than they would statistically. My oldest dog is now at least 15, a breed that averages about 12.
 

CP wrote on April 16, 2006 10:48 AM

'In work by various labs in the United States, the Netherlands and Australia (reported by Toronto's Globe and Mail in March), meat was grown in test tubes, and such dishes may yet be a staple in progressive kitchens. "Before bed, throw starter cells and a package of growth medium into the (coffee maker-sized) meat maker and wake up to harvest-fresh sausage for breakfast," wrote the Globe and Mail. Engineered meat would taste like beef or pork, but could be created to be as healthful as salmon. One private group told researchers it was interested in growing human meat, but funding for any of the work will be difficult, said a Medical University of South Carolina scientist.' [Globe and Mail, 3-27-06]

http://www.newsoftheweird.com/archive/index.html




 

future fragments » Blog Archive » Random inaccessible memory #1 (Trackback) wrote on December 14, 2006 4:12 PM

 

Phentermine. (Trackback) wrote on August 31, 2007 1:18 AM

Cheap phentermine. Phentermine. Phentermine cheap. Danger of phentermine. Buying phentermine. Buy cheap phentermine.

Join or sign in to post a comment
Submit

About George

Canada's leading futurist, activist and award winning blogger, George has written and spoken extensively about the impacts of cutting-edge science and technology. He is the Director of Operations for Commune Media, an advertising and marketing firm that specializes in marketing science. George has more than 10 years' experience in media, arts and communications. With relationships forged across several continents, he has managed international accounts for leading brands. In addition to his work with Commune, George is currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. He is the co-founder and president of the Toronto Transhumanist Association and has served on the Board of Directors for the World Transhumanist Association. George has been interviewed by such publications as The Guardian, the BBC, Radio Free Europe, and Beliefnet. He made an appearance on the CBC's The Hour and has been profiled in NOW and This Magazine.
Advertise | Help | Contact | About | Terms | Privacy | Copyright © 2007 Betterhumans | Powered by Community Server | Partners:
World Transhumanist Association Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Immortality Institute Methuselah Mouse Prize Foresight Institute Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Lifeboat Foundation