in Search
0 members online

George

The future of science

Stewart Brand of the Long Now Foundation has organized a series of seminars which he hopes will build a "coherent, compelling body of ideas about long-term thinking, to help nudge civilization toward Long Now's goal of making long-term thinking automatic and common instead of difficult and rare."

One such seminar has recently been published on Edge.org by Kevin Kelly. Titled, "Speculations on the Future of Science," Kelly tries to predict how science and the scientific method will change over the next 50 years.

As a starting point, he looks at how recursion is at the heart of science; Kelly compiled a list of new recursive devices in the history science:

2000 BC — First text indexes
200 BC — Cataloged library (at Alexandria)
1000 AD — Collaborative encyclopedia
1590 — Controlled experiment (Roger Bacon)
1600 — Laboratory
1609 — Telescopes and microscopes
1650 — Society of experts
1665 — Repeatability (Robert Boyle)
1665 — Scholarly journals
1675 — Peer review
1687 — Hypothesis/prediction (Isaac Newton)
1920 — Falsifiability (Karl Popper)
1926 — Randomized design (Ronald Fisher)
1937 — Controlled placebo
1946 — Computer simulation
1950 — Double blind experiment
1962 — Study of scientific method (Thomas Kuhn)

Looking to the future, Kelly makes some predictions (details can be found in the article):

1) There will be more change in the next 50 years of science than in the last 400 years
2) This will be a century of biology
3) Computers will keep leading to new ways of science
4) New ways of knowing will emerge
5) Science will create new levels of meaning

More specifically, Kelly comes up with possible breakthroughs in how science is done:

Compiled Negative Results - Negative results are saved, shared, compiled and analyzed, instead of being dumped.

Triple Blind Experiments - In a double blind experiment neither researcher nor subject are aware of the controls, but both are aware of the experiment. In a triple blind experiment all participants are blind to the controls and to the very fact of the experiment itself.

Combinatorial Sweep Exploration - Much of the unknown can be explored by systematically creating random varieties of it at a large scale.

Evolutionary Search - If new libraries of variations can be derived from the best of a previous generation of good results, it is possible to evolve solutions.

Multiple Hypothesis Matrix - nstead of proposing a series of single hypothesis, in which each hypothesis is falsified and discarded until one theory finally passes and is verified, a matrix of many hypothesis scenarios are proposed and managed simultaneously.

Pattern Augmentation - Pattern-seeking software which recognizes a pattern in noisy results.

Adaptive Real Time Experiments - Results evaluated, and large-scale experiments modified in real time.

AI Proofs - Artificial intelligence will derive and check the logic of an experiment.

Wiki-Science - The average number of authors per paper continues to rise.

Defined Benefit Funding - The use of prize money for particular scientific achievements will play greater roles.

Zillionics - Ubiquitous always-on sensors in bodies and environment will transform medical, environmental, and space sciences.

Deep Simulations – As our knowledge of complex systems advances, we can construct more complex simulations of them.

Hyper-analysis Mapping – Just as meta-analysis gathered diverse experiments on one subject and integrated their (sometimes contradictory) results into a large meta-view, hyper-analysis creates an extremely large-scale view by pulling together meta-analysis.

Return of the Subjective - Existence seems to be a paradox of self-causality, and any science exploring the origins of existence will eventually have to embrace the subjective, without become irrational.
Published Sunday, March 19, 2006 6:24 PM by George

Comment Notification

Join or sign in to track comments

Comments

 

V wrote on March 20, 2006 10:06 PM

I wish Stewart Brand success with his stated goals and seminar.  And let's hope A.I. can help keep future scientists honest! lol  I do tend to wonder what sort of lopsided relationships human scientists and engineers will have with super-intelligent artificial intelligences as their "partners."  

 As for long-term thinking/planning in our society, at least in corporate America that can be very hard when things are all about making short-term profits to please the shareholders at the next quarterly meeting.        

John Grigg
 

Mr. Farlops wrote on March 21, 2006 7:15 AM

This is very interesting stuff! Thanks very much for bringing it to my attention! It's the first I've seen in recent years about anyone thinking of ways to improve science itself.

But--

George writes, "Return of the Subjective - Existence seems to be a paradox of self-causality, and any science exploring the origins of existence will eventually have to embrace the subjective, without become irrational."

I really don't see how this can be achieved. If we can rigorously analyze the subjective, it's not really subjective anymore, is it? Won't it just be another analytic narrative taken from the outside that won't have any connection to a person's qualia?

I guess I'll have to read the article. The rest of the proposed improvements are very evocative!
 

EmbraceUnity wrote on March 21, 2006 3:14 PM

I agree.  "Wiki-science" sounds like an excellent trend that would improve efficiency and honesty.

As for the prize money incentives... The X-prize certainly showed the potential of this, and I am very glad NASA has offered some similar prizes.  This seems like the best way to spur private investment in many areas of research, since there are usually no other immediate returns that can be had from such investments.  And businesses typically don't plan for the long-run.
Join or sign in to post a comment
Submit

About George

Canada's leading futurist, activist and award winning blogger, George has written and spoken extensively about the impacts of cutting-edge science and technology. He is the Director of Operations for Commune Media, an advertising and marketing firm that specializes in marketing science. George has more than 10 years' experience in media, arts and communications. With relationships forged across several continents, he has managed international accounts for leading brands. In addition to his work with Commune, George is currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. He is the co-founder and president of the Toronto Transhumanist Association and has served on the Board of Directors for the World Transhumanist Association. George has been interviewed by such publications as The Guardian, the BBC, Radio Free Europe, and Beliefnet. He made an appearance on the CBC's The Hour and has been profiled in NOW and This Magazine.
Advertise | Help | Contact | About | Terms | Privacy | Copyright © 2007 Betterhumans | Powered by Community Server | Partners:
World Transhumanist Association Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Immortality Institute Methuselah Mouse Prize Foresight Institute Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Lifeboat Foundation