in Search
0 members online

George

Doom soon?

Transhumanist philosopher Nick Bostrom argues that there is about a 50% chance that humankind will be annihilated this century.

Bostrom, who is currently working with Milan Ćirković on a book about existential risks, has given the topic of human extinction considerable attention, including his seminal 2001 paper, Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios.

Writing in Global Agenda magazine, Bostrom notes how potentially self-inflicted existential risks have only recently appeared in human history, namely the advent of the atomic bomb. Unfortunately, writes Bostrom, this is the first of many other new threats on the horizon. He lists such potential problems as a deliberately engineered pathogen, particle accelerator experiments, molecular nanotechnology run amok, and runaway superintelligence.

Bostrom also notes possible sociological catastrophes, such as the advent of a repressive totalitarian regime or a transhumanism that could "lead to stagnation and thorough debasement of human life."

While pessimistic of our chances, Bostrom is not defeatist, and he suggests that some serious foresight and energy be put into the problem. "The magnitude of existential risks is not a fixed quantity – it becomes larger or smaller depending on human action," he writes. He says that deliberate steps can be made to reduce many existential risks, noting such endeavors as the mapping of potentially dangerous asteroids. Moreover, some of the studies and countermeasures that would reduce existential risk would also be relevant for mitigating lesser hazards, argues Bostrom.

Ultimately, says Bostrom, the challenge is to neither ignore the risks nor to indulge in gloomy despondency but to "seek understanding and to take the most cost-effective steps to make the world safer."

Cross-posted from Sentient Developments.
Published Wednesday, March 01, 2006 9:19 PM by George
Tags:

Comment Notification

Join or sign in to track comments

Comments

 

EschewObfuscation wrote on March 1, 2006 10:12 PM

Glad to see a serious optimist being a serious realist. I don't think enough transhumanists think about this (not that your average non-transhumanist thinks about it any more). Good for him.

But no mention of peak oil? Global warming? Both of these problems are certainly soluble (although they will fscking hurt), but I don't trust the yahoos currently in power to solve them, or any yahoos likely to get elected in the future. Most just aren't imaginative enough to see the solutions, and those that are don't want to present them to their constituents, both because that would be admitting there is a problem and because J. Random Voter isn't imaginative enough either. The private sector might be, but is too stifled by energy monopolists, and to a lesser degree, regulation and general idiocy.

The key to human survival is probably education of the masses. I don't know whether to be heartened or terrified by that fact. The average Westerner certainly is capable of understanding, but who is able enough to show them?
 

EmbraceUnity wrote on March 2, 2006 2:26 AM

Well, it seems to be that global warming is a serious problem, yet I have read some interesting theories on how it could be reversed.

The best solution, assuming the singularity arrives soon enough, is to nanotechnologically terraform earth's atmosphere.

Another solution I heard in Discover sounded quite interesting, yet possibly dangerous.  

Phytoplankton requires iron to thrive.  There are many large areas of the ocean where there isn't enough iron for it to grow.  It has been proven that by adding iron to sections of ocean, phytoplankton growth will speed.  Supposedly they actually dumped a bunch of iron in the ocean and proved this.

Through photosynthesis, these phytoplankton would help reduce global warming.... and possibly destroy the ecosystem

read about it here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_Paradox
 

dagon wrote on March 2, 2006 3:44 AM

Visualise this... we are getting signs that a peak oil may appear to be ... manageable... though decent fusion is still many decades away, a combination of remaining oil, solar collectors, wind energy, coal gasification, hydroelectrical plants, agricultural fuels, recyclables, energy efficiency and *pillaging* will allow *us* to sustain a fairly comfortable level of existence.

Emphasis on us, being the rich first world countries, who are now showing signs of slowly starting to make the transition and waking up to the consequences fossil fuel depletion. That leaves a few billion people in the third world out of the loop unfortunately.

People in Mali won't make the transition to renewable energy, especially if oil costs 150$ a barrel. They'd be spectacularly stuck, and with no incentive to curtail population growth other than by war, famine, pollution and civil disorder.

If I were someone in the third world with a good understanding what was happening (emphasis on pillaging) right now, the rich countries such as Europe, Japan, US, Australia coping (whereas places like Brasil, India, Russia and China *maybe* coping) and quite a few other places NOT coping, I'd be more than a but annoyed.

Actually, now I come to think of that image, I am starting to see the merits of the US preparing for a long war. It probably won't be a war on
"violent extremism" but rather a war against Poor/Envious people.

If I were someone "dying and deeply psychologically scarred", somewhere in the third world (in demographic conditions such as we now find in the Gaza strip or Bagdad), somewhere in 2030, with access to destructive garage bio/nanotechnology, I'd be tempted to just create a deadly strain of something probably with a fluorescent green color and release among first world pedestrians.

Especially if the assumption that people in desperate conditions gravitate to  religious hysteria is true. I'd be tempted to prefer a quick and just armageddon above being somewhere among gigadeath.
 

EmbraceUnity wrote on March 2, 2006 3:54 AM

What signs spark you to say this, considering you used to be even less optimistic?

I disagree with the second half of your post.  I think that even in third world countries they will adapt to clean energy if it is cost efficient.  Most people in third world countries have some connection with the outside world and would pick up on it.  The ones who don't probably do not need any energy anyways. (not that any of this is just)
 

pragmatica wrote on March 2, 2006 7:23 PM

I've vaguely heard about the supposed danger of particle accelerator experiments. I look forward to reading up on this in more detail.  I'm not as worried about engineered pathogens as there is enough immune system variability in humans that no matter what is engineered, at least some humans will be immune by default.

Most species are limited or killed off in substantial numbers by resource exhaustion and/or disease, so I assume humans will be most affected by one or both of these in the future... perhaps even both at once.
Join or sign in to post a comment
Submit

About George

Canada's leading futurist, activist and award winning blogger, George has written and spoken extensively about the impacts of cutting-edge science and technology. He is the Director of Operations for Commune Media, an advertising and marketing firm that specializes in marketing science. George has more than 10 years' experience in media, arts and communications. With relationships forged across several continents, he has managed international accounts for leading brands. In addition to his work with Commune, George is currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. He is the co-founder and president of the Toronto Transhumanist Association and has served on the Board of Directors for the World Transhumanist Association. George has been interviewed by such publications as The Guardian, the BBC, Radio Free Europe, and Beliefnet. He made an appearance on the CBC's The Hour and has been profiled in NOW and This Magazine.
Advertise | Help | Contact | About | Terms | Privacy | Copyright © 2007 Betterhumans | Powered by Community Server | Partners:
World Transhumanist Association Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Immortality Institute Methuselah Mouse Prize Foresight Institute Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Lifeboat Foundation