in Search
0 members online

Dry Observer

Should You Access Your Cyber-Implants Through Your Tongue? And Other Speculations...

The Washington Post reports on some of the latest military-driven human augmentation research:
In their quest to create the superwarrior of the future, some military researchers aren't focusing on the obvious body parts such as legs or biceps or hearts. They're looking at tongues.

By routing signals from helmet-mounted cameras, sonar and other equipment through the tongue to the brain, they hope to give elite troops superhuman senses similar to those of owls, snakes and fish.

Researchers at Florida's Institute for Human and Machine Cognition envision their work giving Army Rangers 360-degree unobstructed vision at night and allowing Navy SEALs to sense sonar in their heads while maintaining normal vision underwater -- turning science fiction into reality.

The device, known as the "Brain Port," was pioneered more than 30 years ago by Paul Bach-y-Rita, a University of Wisconsin neuroscientist. He began routing images from a camera through electrodes taped to people's backs and later discovered the tongue was a superior transmitter.

Normally I would go over all the potential advancements heralded by the research itself. But today, I think it might be more important simply to point out that this new strain of research is being done, and who is doing it. Why?

Because here we see the military working very seriously to create augmented human troops -- "super-soldiers." And because there are a few potential "tipping points" when it comes to the emergence of widespread human augmentation research -- turning points after which radical human augmentation becomes far more likely. Frankly, a major push by the U.S. military to develop superhuman troops is one of the most obvious. Again, why?

The U.S. military can't really afford to be caught behind the power curve on human enhancement tech on the battlefield. Nor can they really afford for U.S. scientists (in the military-industrial complex or otherwise) to fall behind either. And as this sensory enhancement research joins augmented reality displays, power armor, nootropics and other lines of inquiry being paid for by the Pentagon, we can see that with so much money being used to explore so many different augmentation options, eventually these researchers will hit paydirt.

In fact, they'll probably hit it several times. And because it's really hard to take that kind of technology away from the Pentagon for any reason, political or otherwise, that cat will probably stay out of the bag.

Which means the very fact this research exists may in some ways be more important than what they find. Human augmentation research has now been deemed acceptable by one of the most important funding sources in existance. Whatever the consequences, a continued drive for military breakthroughs will reshape this field.


Future Imperative
Published Thursday, May 11, 2006 7:20 PM by Dry Observer

Comment Notification

Join or sign in to track comments

Comments

 

sJon_Piranha wrote on May 12, 2006 4:28 AM

Didn't I see a newscast recently that mentioned DARPA has put money into funding research into giving humans the ability to regenerate lost body parts?

In fact, they teamed up with the McGowan Institute of Regenerative Medicine here in Pittsburgh, PA - granted them a $2 million budget into that very line of research.
 

Dry Observer wrote on May 12, 2006 11:51 AM

And in addition to DARPA and the Pentagon's research into human augmentation, they are also a driving force behind certain kinds of advanced information technology -- such as the next generation of unmanned combat air vehicles (UCAVs) and DARPA's recent contests to find viable autonomous ground vehicle robots. Which means they may also encourage the development of the other kind of superhuman intelligence -- artificial intelligence with no original link to baseline humans (save as designers).

I'm not sure the military will go all the way and create an independent, conscious, superhumanly intelligent AI. They're the kind of people who ask about the downside of having a nigh-omnipotent supercomputer they have no control over and which has only questionable loyalty to them (if any at all).
Join or sign in to post a comment
Submit
Advertise | Help | Contact | About | Terms | Privacy | Copyright © 2007 Betterhumans | Powered by Community Server | Partners:
World Transhumanist Association Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Immortality Institute Methuselah Mouse Prize Foresight Institute Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Lifeboat Foundation