in Search
0 members online

Dry Observer

Mining the Moon, a "Fusion" of Energy and Space Technologies...

Yes, the Russians are planning to mine the Moon. More power to them. Which is, incidentally, the point.

Russia's Energia Space Corporation (heavily state-controlled) plans to build a permanent base on the Moon to start "mining" the isotope Helium 3.

The idea would be to use helium 3 to power thermo-nuclear power stations, harnessing its potency to achieve nuclear fusion.

The technology to exploit helium 3 is still under development, but it has been touted by a significant academic school of thought as "the ideal fuel of the future" with several countries expressing interest. The race is now on to be the first to make it work.

Russian scientists have come up with the idea of using "lunar bulldozers" to heat the Moon's surface in order to get at the resource, and Mr Sevastyanov has told an academic conference that Moscow is keen to institute regular cargo flights of helium 3 back to Earth as soon as possible.


So yes, fusion does have a future. Admittedly, if we get alternative sources going here on Earth, its future may be in space, but it's a promising one nevertheless. (There aren't many sources of wind or water in hard vacuum, nor much in the way of solar power amongst the outer planets or in the Kuiper Belt.)

"We are planning to build a permanent base on the moon by 2015 and by 2020 we can begin the industrial-scale delivery ... of the rare isotope helium 3," Mr Sevastyanov said."The Earth's known hydrocarbon reserves will last mankind 50 to 100 years at the present rate of consumption. There are practically no reserves of helium 3 on Earth. On the Moon, there are between one million and 500 million tons, according to estimates." Much of those reserves are reported to be in the Sea of Tranquillity.

Mr Sevastyanov predicted that nuclear reactors capable of running on helium 3 would soon be developed and said that just one ton of the isotope would generate as much energy as 14 million tons of oil.

"Ten tons of helium 3 would be enough to meet the yearly energy needs of Russia," he added. However, Russia is not the only country interested in the technology. American scientists have expressed interest in helium 3, arguing that one shuttle-load of the isotope would be sufficient to meet US electrical energy needs for a year.

During the Cold War the space race had more to do with prestige but in an era when the world has become acutely aware of the finite nature of its resources, a new 21st-century race is developing with a very different aim: to secure a new source of energy for future generations. Helium 3's chief advantage is that it is not radioactive, so there would not be a problem disposing of it once it had been used.

A relatively radiation-free source of fusion power would be a welcome addition to our energy options indeed. And space itself might be the perfect place for it.


Future Imperative
Published Saturday, January 28, 2006 2:24 AM by Dry Observer

Comment Notification

Join or sign in to track comments

Comments

 

dagon wrote on January 28, 2006 3:16 AM

I have been saying since the late 1980s, we should go to the moon NOW ...

... colonize it modestly, start to mine it for ores in the regolith (incidentally platinum being a good first choice) and tritium, create infrastructure there, work to put into place a permanent extraction facility in the lagrange orbits and ....welll... basicly... become extremely rich once we cross the massive investment treshold.

Humanity Does Not Have An Alternative.

We are bound for several decades of extremely unpleseant global pinch. "Our" governments (inasmuch as they are ours) are desperate and hard pressed to provide a trickle of economic growth to supply us with the bare minumum of employment, wellfare and safety. They can barely manage right now, with globalization and capitalism overstretched as is, almost dehumanizing competition from low wage countries (I call them desperatocracies) and the extremely poor or desperate nipping at all our heels (in the form of terrorist radicals, drug peddlers) and illegal immigrants.

Yeah, I tell you one thing, specialists who continue stating we have "only" 50-100 years of fossil fuels left sound to me like backalley junkies who keep reaffirming the mantra the dope deppler is just around the corner and eager to provide them with another few doses worth of credit.

It just aint so.

We are less than 10 years from the peak of oil, less than 25 from a peak of natural gas, less than 50 from a peak of easily extracted uranium... We are going BANKRUPT globally, whereas populations are steadily exploding billions at a time.

We (all of humanity, not just us fat spoiled bratty westerners) NEED fusion as soon as possible. I am NOT talking 2050 and I get pissed off when officials suggest 2050 is the expected timescale. We need working, energy producing, safe fusion before 2025 at the very last.

And then we need ample access to platinum catalysts before 2030 because without them we don't have a clue to keep a hydrogen economy going.

Yes, and in order to do that we need to start mining the moon, creating lagrange habitats, extracting platinum, harvesting asteroids as soon as possible.

We can't just keep wasting enormous amounts of money on unilateralist viking style resource grab crap like the U.S. is doing. Sure, I empathize, the US is fast on its way to collapsing and they want to hold onto their petrochemical power base as long as they can (untill just maybe the nanotech santa comes along, waves his magic wand and magics up a new economical boom) but I will take a bet to submit to repeated sodomy that a mad resource grab for the remaining resources in god awfull hellholes like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq or the Congo is not gonna cut it for decades.. Worse, subjugating "other race" oil countries, building walls all over the place will waste a vital percentage of the precious energy.

If I suggest anything, I suggest people at Betterhumans do ANYTHING to spread this meme.

A permanently manned lunar base by 2015
The first extraction of lunar ores by 2020
Viable fusion by 2025
The first important of lunar ores by 2030

N O L A T E R or we are S C R E W E D
 

Revolution wrote on January 28, 2006 2:47 PM

Ok, this is a disclaimer. I am enthusiastic about the prospects of space colonization and resource utilization. I like people like you.

However, moon mining is not feasible.

Reason 1:
No reason to create infrastructure. In order for moon mining to be cheap, there must first exist a huge infrastructure, capable of mining tons and tons of ore and launching it back to earth. However, given the existence of Mars, a much friendlier, warmer, more earthlike climate with more resources, there is no reason to settle on the Moon.

Reason 2:
Launch costs. I am a firm believer that the private spaceflight revolution will drop costs by a factor of 100. However, in order to make moon mining economically feasible, you would have to drop costs by a factor of 10,000. Maybe once we have fusion powered spacecraft, costs will drop by a factor of 1000, but that is not enough. Even if there were pre-mined tanks of Helium-3 sitting on the moon waiting to be picked up, it would not be economically feasible to pick them up and bring them back here. We have helium-3 on earth. Granted, it is in much lower concentrations than on the moon per ton of helium, but the easier availability of helium here on earth trumps that by an enormous factor.

Mars is the logical choice for the first off-earth society. There is plenty of deuterium, a heavy isotope of hydrogen, which can be used by itself for fusion. It also has water, an atmosphere, and a roughly 24 hour day. In the end... no space colony is going to profit off of bulk exportation of raw materials. Exports will have to be intellectual property, information, real estate claims, or other massless things. So why not do that from a place where you have some likelihood of survivial, i.e. Mars.

The information about the feasability of moon mining comes through John Lewis' book "Mining the Sky" and Robert Zubrin's book "Entering Space." These are very credible authors.
 

dagon wrote on January 29, 2006 1:46 AM

I think settling the moon is essential, I read the ideas in "The High Frontier" and base my ideas largely on that.

Colonization has to be self supporting at every stage. I cannot see colonization of Mars, at best months away, happening without huge resources allready being in space. The only way to do that is build them in near earth environments, and NOT from resources we all haul from the gravity well. And what do we do then? go down another gravity well, i.e. mars.

It's comparativly easy to export materials from the moon: by mass drivers using solar collectors.

As a comparison: to colonize america you first need big wooden ships. You can't go and build those in Cuba.
 

advancedatheist wrote on January 29, 2006 12:27 PM

Dagon writes,

<I>We are less than 10 years from the peak of oil, less than 25 from a peak of natural gas, less than 50 from a peak of easily extracted uranium... </i>

Glad that some other Transhumanists have picked up on this. The UK, Europe, Russia and the Caucasus nations (including Turkey) have had touch-and-go natural gas supplies this winter because of the extreme cold and the advanced depletion in the North Sea & Russian gas fields. The U.S., especially in the Northeast, would have experienced similar problems by now except that we've had a relatively warm winter so far. According to the cornucopians, we have more fossil fuels than we know what to do with, as far as the eye can see -- so why would a bad winter nearly cause a life-threatening emergency in a wide swath of generally developed countries?

As for oil, the British Government recently commissioned a study which concluded that we'll have to relinquish long-distance travel by the middle of this century because of fuel shortages:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,174-2011758,00.html

Also,

http://supersurvival.blogspot.com/2006/01/why-overseas-cryonicists-need-to.html

I submit that this will happen a lot sooner, especially if political events cause long-term disruptions to the remaining decent oil supplies.
 

Acrinoe wrote on January 30, 2006 3:07 PM

I'm with Dagon on this issue. Environmental considerations are not a real limiter with mining of the moon. (Getting the material back to Earth really doesn't require an extended human colony). The real factor is the gravity well.

Setting up a fully or semi-automated (teleoperated) mining facility on the moon will be much cheaper than trying to continually climb in and out of Mars greater gravity well. (and think of the distances and time involved in Mars transit, oy vey!)

A nice mass driver could deliver all the H3 back to Earth without any need for propellant (aka the Moon is a Harsh Mistress - Heinlein, a very nice read).

I think the prospects of embarking on any such costly endevour would need to have a proven pay-back. Firstly, working H3 fusion reactors proven on Earth would be a must, before the first dime is dropped on moon mining.

Now, imagine how much more do-able a Mar mission would be with a huge Lunar mass driver self powered with good old H3 as a startup boost and spaceships powered by the huge energy densities of H3 fusion engines. Now we're cooking with (H3) gas!
 

dagon wrote on January 31, 2006 3:24 AM

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Could_NASA_Get_To_Pluto_Faster_Space_Expert_Says_Yes_By_Thinking_Nuclear.html
 

Acrinoe wrote on January 31, 2006 7:24 AM


http://www.nuclearspace.com/
 

The race to Mars | [Geeks Are Sexy] Technology News (Trackback) wrote on September 22, 2007 10:45 AM

 

http://www.betterhumans.com/blogs/dry_observer/archive/2006/01/28/4193.aspx (Trackback) wrote on March 24, 2008 2:57 AM

Join or sign in to post a comment
Submit
Advertise | Help | Contact | About | Terms | Privacy | Copyright © 2007 Betterhumans | Powered by Community Server | Partners:
World Transhumanist Association Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Immortality Institute Methuselah Mouse Prize Foresight Institute Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Lifeboat Foundation