-
Life Extension
Express is now available from Amazon.com.
If you want to see how and why aging will be reversible… possibly in your
lifetime, go to
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=life+extension+express&x=13&y=21.
This quick, easy and enjoyable read
could ensure your endless youth. Order your copy
now.
I had an interesting week. In
conjunction with Life Extension Foundation (LEF) and Greta Blackburn, we played
host to many of the Emmy award actors, actresses and other entertainment
industry personalities. It was a pre-Emmy Award event where celebrities go to
try out your “stuff” and to hype the Emmys.
Our stuff included the extensive
benefits from memberships in LEF as well as the breakthrough Signals skin care
line. www.LEF.org/maxlife and www.Signals120.com.
It was a fun event from which I
learned a few things. First, the celebrity crowd is much younger than I thought.
They somehow look older on TV. It’s been years since I watched much television,
and now I know another reason why. I thought was simply a waste of time for most
shows, and for me, it is. That’s because most of the shows target audiences from
teenagers to the thirty-somethings. So the experience made me feel old. Ouch!
But it also strengthened my resolve to recapture my
youth.
The second thing I learned is the
young hip Hollywood crowd is not in tune with
life extension. In fact, many did not even know what “life extension” means. But
once they get to be around thirty that changes. Those over forty were almost
unanimously fascinated by what is and what might be available to
them.
We went to the show to make the
entertainment industry more aware of healthy life extension possibilities. Of
course, they were almost all interested in beauty enhancements. But they seemed
to be more aware of surgical answers then the non-invasive approaches LEF
offers. And for the most part, they knew little to nothing about extreme life
extension possibilities and technologies.
This will soon change. The
entertainment industry has more influence than most, and they gravitate toward
anything that could make them younger or appear younger. That’s why we were
there. By educating only that core group, we can leverage our way to much wider
audiences. That in turn legitimizes an industry that many perceive as one that
is top heavy with quacks selling their snake oils to a desperate crowd. Once
they understand what works and what doesn’t, and once they understand that
science-based age reversal may no longer be an impossible dream for them, it
will no longer be an uphill battle getting them to support the
research.
Life Extension
Express clearly explains the concept and
was written to change the way most people think about the inevitability of aging
and decline. Get your copy now at
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=life+extension+express&x=13&y=21.
-
Life Extension
Express is now available from Amazon.com.
If you want to see how and why aging will be reversible… possibly in your
lifetime, go to
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=life+extension+express&x=13&y=21.
This quick, easy and enjoyable read
could ensure your endless youth. Order your copy
now.
I had an interesting week. In
conjunction with Life Extension Foundation (LEF) and Greta Blackburn, we played
host to many of the Emmy award actors, actresses and other entertainment
industry personalities. It was a pre-Emmy Award event where celebrities go to
try out your “stuff” and to hype the Emmys.
Our stuff included the extensive
benefits from memberships in LEF as well as the breakthrough Signals skin care
line. www.LEF.org/maxlife and www.Signals120.com.
It was a fun event from which I
learned a few things. First, the celebrity crowd is much younger than I thought.
They somehow look older on TV. It’s been years since I watched much television,
and now I know another reason why. I thought was simply a waste of time for most
shows, and for me, it is. That’s because most of the shows target audiences from
teenagers to the thirty-somethings. So the experience made me feel old. Ouch!
But it also strengthened my resolve to recapture my
youth.
The second thing I learned is the
young hip Hollywood crowd is not in tune with
life extension. In fact, many did not even know what “life extension” means. But
once they get to be around thirty that changes. Those over forty were almost
unanimously fascinated by what is and what might be available to
them.
We went to the show to make the
entertainment industry more aware of healthy life extension possibilities. Of
course, they were almost all interested in beauty enhancements. But they seemed
to be more aware of surgical answers then the non-invasive approaches LEF
offers. And for the most part, they knew little to nothing about extreme life
extension possibilities and technologies.
This will soon change. The
entertainment industry has more influence than most, and they gravitate toward
anything that could make them younger or appear younger. That’s why we were
there. By educating only that core group, we can leverage our way to much wider
audiences. That in turn legitimizes an industry that many perceive as one that
is top heavy with quacks selling their snake oils to a desperate crowd. Once
they understand what works and what doesn’t, and once they understand that
science-based age reversal may no longer be an impossible dream for them, it
will no longer be an uphill battle getting them to support the
research.
Life Extension
Express clearly explains the concept and
was written to change the way most people think about the inevitability of aging
and decline. Get your copy now at
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=life+extension+express&x=13&y=21.
-
Normal
0
false
false
false
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
When I
initially propose the concept of extreme life extension, I'm often met with a
knee-jerk reaction which goes something like this:
"What
will we do with all the people?"
It's a
logical ages-old question actually. But like most "obvious" flawed
arguments, it's easily disproven once you dig deep. So let's go deep and see
what we find:
Amazingly
enough, when you factor out immigration, industrialized countries are actually
seeing population declines rather than increases. And according to world
renowned economist Julian Simon, our current resources and technologies
(without considering those that are undeveloped) could support 6 billion more
people. Misallocation of those resources and technologies, usually due to
bureaucratic bottlenecks and political greed and ineptitude, are the culprits.
Since
the Industrial Revolution, alarmists screamed doom and gloom about overcrowding
and limited resources (backed by their "statistics"). However, the
opposite has happened. The population increased by 740% since then, and
standards of living have soared. It's not so much a question of resources as it
is one of education, individual productivity and distribution--social problems,
not life-extension problems. As long as people produce more than they consume,
it's impossible to run out of resources.
Common
sense and intuition say there should be a demographic catastrophe, if people
were actually immortal and continued to reproduce. But what would the science
(mathematics) say? Recently, Drs. Leonid and Natalia Gavrilov answered that
question with a study sponsored by the SENS/Methuselah Foundation.
They proved
it is possible to have sustainable population dynamics in a future hypothetical
non-aging society.
They proved
that (even) immortality, the joy of parenting and a sustainable population size
are not mutually exclusive.
This is
because a population of immortal reproducing organisms will grow indefinitely
in time, but not necessarily indefinitely in size.
Many
developed countries (like the studied Sweden)
face dramatic decline in native-born population in the future and also risk
losing their cultural identity due to massive immigration. Therefore, extension
of healthy lifespan in these countries may in fact prevent, rather than create
a demographic catastrophe.
The
Gavrilovs painted five scenarios:
- Negligible senescence where all
anti-aging interventions start at age 60 years with 30-year time lag. Even
in the case of defeating aging (no aging after 60 years) the natural
population growth is relatively small (about 20% increase over 70 years).
- Negligible senescence for a
part of population (10%). What if only a small fraction of the population
accepts anti-aging interventions. The population declines.
- Negligible senescence for a
part of population (10%) with growing acceptance (1 percent added to
negligible senescence group each year), and the last remaining five
percent of population refuse to apply these technologies in any
circumstances. The Population still declines, but only slightly
- Rejuvenation. Mortality
declines after age 60 years until the levels observed at age 10 are
reached; mortality remains constant thereafter. In this case, population
would increase about 20% over 70 years. How about when rejuvenation starts
at age 40 instead of age 60? Now we see a manageable 40% increase over 70
years.
- And finally a more modest
scenario where aging slows down still results in population declines.
A general
conclusion of this study is that population changes are surprisingly small and
slow in their response to dramatic life extension. Even in the case of the most
radical life extension scenario, population growth could be relatively slow and
may not necessarily lead to overpopulation. Therefore, the real concerns should
be placed not on the threat of overpopulation, but rather on such potential
obstacles to a successful biomedical war on aging, such as scientific, organizational
and financial limitations.
Thank you
Leonid and Natalie.
If you'd
like to see details of their study, go to http://longevity-science.org/present.html.
The
longer we keep ourselves alive, the more brainpower we have to see real and
imagined problems through. Just as technology extends lives, it makes life more
livable for larger populations. Telling people they should die to make room for
others is an idiotic solution to any problem.
-
Normal
0
false
false
false
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
Did you
read Life Extension Express yet? If
so, refer to Chapter 11: Step 7–Attitude.
In some
ways, it’s the most important chapter in the book. It sets the foundation for
the first six steps that could buy you enough healthy years to live long enough
to take advantage of tomorrow’s extreme life extending technologies. That’s why
it encourages me to see corroborating articles and opinions from medical experts.
Listen, I
really want this for you. I’m absolutely convinced some people who would have
otherwise perished, will see the day when scientific breakthroughs give them
open-ended youth, due to the information in Life
Extension Express. But some isn’t
enough. I want it for you. I want it
for those you love and for those you don’t know. I want it for everyone and
will be thrilled when thousands and then millions benefit.
You can be
one of them, especially if you get your head into the longevity game. Your body
will follow.
The
following information was posted on www.eurekalert.org Longevity and
Age Management, Aging,
Cardio-Vascular,
Longevity.
Past studies conducted on siblings and offspring of
centenarians have clearly demonstrated that longevity runs in strong families.
In fact, studies have shown distinctly lower prevalence rates and delayed onset
of several diseases, including cardiovascular disease, hypertension and
diabetes. Because personality traits have been shown to have hereditary
components, researchers from Boston University School of Medicine's New England
Centenarian Study "hypothesized" that certain personality
characteristics could be critical to the healthy aging of the offspring of
centenarians.
Collaborating with scientists from the National Institute on
Aging, the researchers tested their hypothesis using the NEO-Five-Factor
Inventory questionnaire to measure the personality traits of 125 women and 121
men with an average age of 75. None of the participants were related, and each
was the offspring of a centenarian. The questionnaire scored five key
personality characteristics: neuroticism, extraversion, openness,
agreeableness, and conscientiousness.
Researchers found that both male and female participants
"scored in the low range of published norms for neuroticism and in the
high range for extraversion." The women also scored on the high side for
agreeableness. Both the men and women participants scored within the normal
range for conscientiousness and openness, and the men scored within normal
range for agreeableness. The findings were published on line in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
"Interestingly, whereas men and women generally differ
substantially in their personality characteristics, the male and female
offspring tended to be similar, which speaks to the importance of these traits,
irrespective of gender, for health aging and longevity," says Dr. Thomas
Perls, MPH, Director of the New England Centenarian Study. "For example,
people who are lower in neuroticism are able to manage or regulate stressful situations
more effectively than those with higher neuroticism levels. Similarly, high
extraversion levels have been associated with establishing friendships and
looking after yourself," he says. And he adds "these findings suggest
that personality is an important characteristic to include in studies that
assess genetic and environmental determinants of longevity."
-
In a previous blog, I mentioned
Ray Kurzweil would be one of the most influential persons as to when extreme
life extension arrives. As a result, he could be responsible for helping rescue
millions from premature suffering and death. Ray doesn’t do aging research. He
is an inventor and a thinking machine. In fact, he is described as “the ultimate
thinking machine” by Forbes and “the restless genius” by the Wall Street
Journal.
Inc. magazine ranked him #8 among
entrepreneurs in the United
States, calling him the “rightful heir to Thomas Edison,”
and PBS included Ray as one of 16 “revolutionaries who made America”. Bill
Gates called him the most accurate predictor of future of technologies.
An independent, feature-length
documentary was made about Kurzweil, his life, and his ideas called Transcendent
Man. It recently premiered at the Tribeca Film
Festival. Transcendent Man documents Ray's quest to
reveal mankind's ultimate destiny and explores many of the ideas found in his
New York Times bestselling book, The Singularity is
Near. He movie includes his concept of exponential
growth, radical life expansion, and how we will transcend our biology.
I have known and respected Ray for a
number of years. The reason I say he is integral to developing extreme life
extension in our lifetimes is his Law of Accelerating Returns. Ray and his ten
person research team compiled thousands of pages of documents to predict the
future of technology by carefully applying the concept of exponential growth. He
has been uncanningly accurate in the past.
Essentially, the technology we use
to solve challenges such as aging and disease doubles in power every year and
will continue to double even quicker as time passes. That means the incredibly
sophisticated tools we use today will be over 1000 times more powerful in only
10 years and a billion times more
powerful in 25 years.
So isn’t that destined to happen
anyway? Sure. But Ray brings awareness to the concept and teaches the world that
age reversal is possible in your lifetimes. That in turn motivates people like
me to write about it and to encourage investments and donations to launch the
research and finish it while you are still alive. It encourages students to
enter the field, and it lights fires under the whole
industry.
Once Transcendent
Man gets distributed, it will add even more fuel to
the fire. Moving research up by just one year could rescue up to 37 million
dying people.
I had the good fortune to attend a
private viewing last Thursday evening. When you see Transcendent
Man, you will then understand the implications it
could have on your health and longevity.
-
Normal
0
false
false
false
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
On June 24th and 25th, 2000, Maximum
Life Foundation sponsored its first international anti-aging scientific
conference in Manhattan Beach,
California.
Its purpose was to brainstorm ideas that could lead to
breakthroughs in extreme life extension medicine. It held conferences the next
two years and worked with the dozen participants and other scientists since to
develop a scientific roadmap to reverse the aging process. This all-out assault
on aging was dubbed the “Manhattan Beach Project”.
We now know what needs to be developed to deliver open-ended
youth to you and to your loved ones. And we know how to eventually rescue many
of the 100,000 people who die every day from aging. We even have an idea as to
what it will cost and about how long it might take once we raise the funds.
On November 13th-15th, we are going to
launch the Manhattan Beach Project.
The Project
will marshal the best forces of the capitalistic system to not only conquer
aging, but it will also lead to full age-reversal. That means, transforming the
elderly into twenty-something versions of themselves.
Recent
breakthroughs tell us this is real—we will reverse the aging process, and researchers
have proven the concept with several new scientific approaches.
Radically
increased lifespans depend mostly on how soon real anti-aging medicine is developed and commercialized.
Fourteen of
the leading life extension scientists will meet in Manhattan Beach to put the finishing touches
on the scientific roadmap to conquer aging. It will not only showcase all the
various technologies that need to be developed, but we will fine tune real
timelines and real budgets to do it, mostly within the private sector.
But that’s
just the beginning.
The last
day of the session will be closed to all except the movers and the shakers of
the world.
At that
private session, successful entrepreneurs; business management experts; ultra
wealthy individuals; publicists; marketing gurus; prominent members of the
entertainment industry, including athletes; venture capitalists; money
managers; politicians and industry leaders will participate in a Longevity
Summit master mind session to successfully launch what promises to be one of
the most influential events in medical history. We already have a good lineup
and are looking for more fabulously successful creative participants. Please
let me know right away if you have any candidates. Send an email to info@maxlife.org with your recommendations.
I can prove
to them that the last nine years of research have shown we are on the verge of
either being part of the last generation to suffer and die from aging… or part
of the first to enjoy open-ended youth and vitality.
Launching
this project will mean tomorrow’s age-reversing medical miracles could mature
in your lifetime.
-
Normal
0
false
false
false
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
Last week, we discussed Dr. Nathaniel Branden and how
continuing to build self-esteem makes life worth living.
Why do you think so many people eat,
drink, sloth and smoke their way to sickness and an early grave? Some say they
want to follow healthy lifestyles but keep falling off the wagon. Why do others
substitute sustainable healthy habits for deadly habits? Obviously those have a
stronger desire for good health and longevity. Building a strong psychological
foundation makes good habit forming easier.
You’re not born with high
self-esteem. Some of us lucked out and were born into families or environments conducive
to high self-esteem though. Most of us weren’t so lucky and carried negative
baggage into adulthood. By then, we should have attained a measurable amount of
volition. At some point in our lives, we are all given the opportunity and the
choice to boost self-esteem regardless of our current levels. They can always
be higher
Strengthening self-esteem is like constructing
a house. You establish a firm foundation and build up from there. But it’s not
like building a house in the sense that you do it once and live in it for the
rest of your life. Growth is a lifelong process, and an enjoyable one at that,
once you start reaping your emotional, financial, romantic, spiritual, and health
rewards.
Dr. Branden wrote THE book on
self-esteem, The Six Pillars of Self-Esteem.
You are lucky to this information available to you. When you read his book, it could
be a life changer for you. He has also written extensively on the subject in
various reports.
In a timeless 1990 essay, Dr.
Branden contributed the following:
“To the extent that we are confident
in the efficacy of our minds—confident of our ability to think, learn,
understand—we tend to persevere when faced with difficult or complex
challenges. Persevering, we tend to succeed more often than we fail, thus confirming
and reinforcing our sense of efficacy. To the extent that we doubt the efficacy
of our minds and lack confidence in our thinking, we tend not to persevere but
to give up. Giving up, we fail more often than we succeed, thus confirming and
reinforcing our negative self-assessment.
“High self-esteem seeks the
stimulation of demanding goals; and reaching demanding goals nurtures good
self-esteem. Low self-esteem seeks safety of the familiar and undemanding; and
confining oneself to the familiar and undemanding serves to weaken self-esteem.
“The higher our self-esteem, the
better equipped we are to cope with adversity in our careers or in our personal
lives; the quicker we are to pick ourselves up after a fall; the more energy we
have to begin anew.
The higher our self-esteem, the more
ambitious we tend to be, not necessarily in a career or financial sense, but in
terms of what we hope to experience in life—emotionally, creatively,
spiritually. The lower our self-esteem, the less we aspire to, and the less we
are likely to achieve. Either path tends to be self-reinforcing and
self-perpetuating.
“The higher our self-esteem, the
more disposed we are to form nourishing rather than toxic relationships—since
like is drawn to like, health is attracted to health, and vitality and
expansiveness in others are naturally more appealing to persons of good
self-esteem than are emptiness and dependency.
“An important principle of human relationships is that we
tend to feel most comfortable, most “at home,” with persons whose self-esteem
level resembles our own. High self-esteem individuals tend to be drawn to high
self-esteem individuals. Medium self-esteem individuals are typically attracted
to medium self-esteem individuals. Low self-esteem seeks low self-esteem in others.
The most disastrous relationships are those between two persons both of who
think poorly of themselves.”
I know how filled your days must be. If you’re like me, you
have a hard time finding the time to read anything outside your field. So if
you don’t have the time to read The Six Pillars of
Self-Esteem, I urge you to at least read Dr. Branden’s short essay
titled…
…What Self-Esteem Is and Is Not
Click on the following link now:
http://www.nathanielbranden.com/catalog/articles_essays/what_self_esteem.html
If you want to read Dr. Branden’s complete 1990 essay, go to
this link:
http://www.nathanielbranden.com/catalog/articles_essays/what_is_self_esteem?utm_campaign=A%20Personal%20Message%20from%20Nathaniel&utm_content=kekich@maxlife.org&utm_medium=Email&utm_source=VerticalResponse&utm_term=What%20is%20Self-Esteem%3F
-
Normal
0
false
false
false
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
Okay. Let’s say we solve the aging puzzle on time. You won’t
get sick. You won’t get old. You’ll be youthful and happy for as long as you
want.
Or will you?
Don’t forget, more time will magnify the good and the not so
good. If you enjoy high self-esteem, life will be good. If it’s not as high as
you’d like, it might be a drag. That’s true no matter how long we live. So
shouldn’t self-esteem be something we might want to pay attention to? Shouldn’t
it be the foundation upon which we build our lives?
First, exactly what is self-esteem? I have the most sensible
answer for you. It comes straight from Dr. Nathaniel Branden, often referred to
as “the father of self-esteem”, and a cherished friend.
According to Dr.
Branden, “Self-esteem is an experience. It is a particular way of experiencing
the self. It is a good deal more than a mere feeling. It involves emotional,
evaluative, and cognitive components. It also entails certain action
dispositions: to move toward life rather than away from it; to move toward
consciousness rather than away from it; to treat facts with respect rather than
denial; to operate self-responsibly rather than the opposite.
“Self-esteem is
the disposition to experience oneself as being competent to cope with the basic
challenges of life and of being worthy of happiness. It is confidence in the
efficacy of our mind, in our ability to think. By extension, it is confidence
in our ability to learn, make appropriate choices and decisions, and respond
effectively to change. It is also the experience that success, achievement,
fulfillment—happiness—are right and natural for us.
“Self-esteem is
not the euphoria or buoyancy that may be temporarily induced by a drug, a
compliment, or a love affair. It is not an illusion or hallucination. Lots of
things (some of them quite dubious) can make us “feel good”—for a while. If
self-esteem is not grounded in reality, if it is not built over time through
the appropriate operation of mind—for example, through operating consciously,
self-responsibly, and with integrity--it is not self-esteem.
“Rationally, one
does not focus on self-esteem per se; one focuses on the practices that support
and nurture self-esteem—such as the practice of living consciously, of
self-acceptance, of self-responsibility, of self-assertiveness, of
purposefulness, and of integrity, as I discuss in The Six
Pillars of Self-Esteem.
“Self-esteem
demands a high reality-orientation; it is grounded in a reverent respect for
facts and truth. Excessive and inappropriate self-absorption is symptomatic of
poor self-esteem, not high self-esteem. If there is something we are confident
about, we do not obsess about it—we get on with living.”
Well said Nathaniel.
Extreme life
extension is as much about the quality of your life as the quantity. Both take
work. If you’re willing to invest in your mind as well as your body, then I
suggest you devour a copy of The Six Pillars of
Self-Esteem.
This is such an important issue
that I am going to cover more next week. Meanwhile, why not visit some of Dr. Branden’s historical blogs for more
information? Start with:
http://nathanielbranden.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/answering-misconceptions-about-self-esteem/
-
Normal
0
false
false
false
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
A twenty
year study proves calorie restriction works in primates.
The
ancients knew eating less was a path to health and longevity. Our grandparents’
generation knew it. But we forgot.
The average
American consumes over 3000 calories a day now. It used to be around 2000. Two thirds
of us are overweight. One third is obese. The average female’s waistline
ballooned by almost two inches in the last decade. And for the first time in
history, we are starting to die earlier! But not all of us.
Those who eat
less are living longer. Those who practice caloric restriction (CR) rarely have
arterial plaque, are almost immune from diabetes, hypertension, early heart
disease and a host of other diseases and are resistant to cancer as well. A
study of people practicing CR (average age 52) showed their average blood
pressure was 103/63, most of their other biomarkers were about as good, and the
thickness of their artery walls compared to that of teenagers. Finally, their
cardiorespiratory endurance looked 17 years younger than
normal.
CR means
cutting calories by about 30% to about 1400 calories a day while ingesting nutritious
food. But as you’ll see, there may be an easier way.
CR is the
only proven method to extend the maximum life span in mammals. Humans live too
long to be good longevity test subjects. However, first results are in from a
primate CR study.
In a report published in the July 10, 2009 issue of Science,
Professor Richard Weindruch and colleagues at the University of Wisconsin
reveal that calorie restriction is indeed successful at improving survival and
delaying disease in rhesus macaques, whose average life span is 27 years.
"We have been able to show that caloric restriction can slow the aging
process in a primate species," Dr Weindruch announced.
The study divided 76 macaques aged 7 to 14 to receive diets that
allowed them to consume as much food as they wanted, or diets which contained
30 percent fewer calories than the unrestricted diets. Thirty of the animals
began the diets in 1989 and 46 in 1994.
As of this year, 80 percent of the animals given restricted
diets are alive, compared to half of the unrestricted animals. Cancer and
cardiovascular disease incidence is over 50 percent lower in the calorie
restricted animals, and impaired glucose regulation has not been observed.
"So far, we've seen the complete prevention of diabetes," Dr
Weindruch stated.
Additionally, brain volume, motor control, working memory and
problem solving abilities appear to be better maintained in the restricted
monkeys.
"The atrophy or loss of brain mass known to occur with
aging is significantly attenuated in several regions of the brain," Dr.
Weindruch added. "That's a completely new observation."
The current primate
study's results are the best indicator to date that calorie restriction might
be one means of allowing humans to live longer in better health.
Do
you need to starve yourself to get some of these benefits? No. Spartan lifestyles
cut into the quality of your life. But it’s surprisingly easy to get down to
about 1800 calories a day. If everyone did that, we wouldn’t have the
healthcare concerns we have today. Most people simply wouldn’t get sick. See
chapter Five in Life Extension Express
for helpful hints on lowering your caloric intake.
If
that’s even too tough for you, there’s still hope. Researchers are working on
CR mimetics, or drugs and maybe nutritionals that trick your body into thinking
it is being caloric restricted. So one day, you may be able to have your cake
and eat it too.
-
Normal
0
false
false
false
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
Pretty sobering, isn’t it?
Yesterday, about 100,203 lives were snuffed out prematurely.
But hardly anyone noticed while the international press clamored to report on
the 23 new deaths from the swine flu.
That’s because we’re used to losing
100,000 lives a day, equivalent to over 500 jetliners falling from the sky
every day, from a cause we can do something about… but don’t. Aging! That’s 100,000 lives yesterday, the
day before, today and tomorrow. Total about 37 million every year.
Nanomedicine expert Robert Freitas
points out that each of us carries within us a unique and complex universe of
knowledge, skills, wisdom, life experience and human relationships. Almost all
this rich treasury of information is forever lost when you die. If the vast
content of each person's life can be summarized in just one book, then every
year, death from aging robs us of 37 million books, worldwide. So each year, we
allow a destruction of knowledge equivalent to three Libraries of Congress.
Natural death also destroys wealth
on a grand scale. According to insurance company estimates, there’s an average
value of about $2 million dollars for each human life lost, or an economic loss
of about $74 trillion dollars—every year.
That's almost equal to the entire tangible wealth of the world.
We have accepted the fact that deaths from aging are
“natural”, and they are scattered worldwide. So we tend to disregard not only
the personal tragedies, but also the treasures society loses in terms of that
wisdom, experience, skills and knowledge that disappears with them.
But I promise
researchers will not only someday be able to stop aging dead in its tracks...
but will also be able to reverse the ravages of aging. In other words,
they’ll be able to turn old men and women into healthy mature adults who look
and feel like 25 year olds. Seeing this happen in your lifetime is my mission.
While hundreds of billions of dollars are spent on cancer, heart
disease and other research... and even more on treatment, we calculate aging
can be solved for a fraction of that amount - if it's spent the right way.
And Maximum Life Foundation identified that way. Over the
past nine years, we discovered how science can control and even reverse the
aging process, maybe within 20 more years. Armed with the law of Accelerating
Returns” - we can put our assault on aging, the Manhattan “Beach”
Project, into high gear. We know what it takes to succeed. We're determined to
avoid being part of the last generation to die from aging... when we can be the
first generation to control our destinies.
Then we will look for headlines like this:
“100,203 Saved by World’s Biggest Medical
Breakthrough”
Long life!
|