in Search
0 members online

David Kekich

Life's Purpose Wrap Up

Dear Future Centenarian,

 

We’re going to wind up our “Purpose of Life” discussion. Last week’s issue triggered some reader responses. Here are two of them:

 

Josh Kyle discussed the topic with his rabbi, who expanded on the Jewish slant on life’s purpose. He said “__another answer that is part of normative Jewish belief is that we are obligated to improve/repair the world while we are part of it.”

 

Simple and elegant. Can you argue with that? I can’t. I don’t know anyone who would. Do you?

 

The Mark Joyner added “In relation to worldviews, I’ve developed one that I think gives us the most freedom and power:  Utilitarian Model Flexibility.” 

 

“To sum up: Given that we don’t have any way of knowing any true objective reality (at least there is no universally agreed upon way of determining one), we can then look at different worldviews, theories, etc. as ‘models’ of the world that serve a greater or lesser level of practical value in our lives. Newtonian Physics has great utility if you’re firing an artillery shell.  It has little if you’re trying to split an atom. Based on what we want in any given moment, we are flexible with our model and adopt one that serves whatever our utility is in that moment.”

 

Utilititarian—serving some purpose or aim.

Model—your model of the world.

Flexibility – changeable at will.

 

“If we make that our starting point it prevents a lot of conflict (both mental and external) that results from our erroneous notion that dogma is possible.”

 

Thanks Mark. This is more complex and stimulating. I’d like to debate the fact that “we don’t have any way of knowing any true objective reality” the next time you visit the U.S. We may end up agreeing in principal once we agree on definitions. One way to bring everyone closer to universal agreement on any given issue is to have precise definitions.

 

Now to wrap up the other dozen major philosophies.

 

Christian view. Christians draw many of their beliefs from the Holy Bible, and believe that loving God is the meaning of life.

Islamic view. In Islam the ultimate objective of man is to seek the pleasure of Allah by living in accordance with the Divine guidelines as stated in the Qur'an and the Tradition of the Prophet. The Qur'an states that the whole purpose behind the creation of man was for glorifying and worshipping Allah.

Bahá'í view. The purpose of human life, say Bahá'ís, is spiritual growth. This is conceived almost as an organic process, like the development of a fetus, and continues after death.

Hindu views. The notion of lila (literally, "play") refers to the idea of the universe as a cosmic game, and meaning as a "play of significance". This "play" is what gives us the key to the meaning of life, and the meaning of life is to achieve Moksha through love towards God and on God's grace.

Jain view. Its ethical system promotes self-discipline above all else. Happiness is the result of self-conquest and freedom from external objects. The meaning of life may then be said to be to use the physical body to achieve self-realization and bliss.

Buddhist views. One of the central views in Buddhism is a nondual worldview, in which subject and object are the same, and the sense of doer-ship is illusionary. On this account, the meaning of life is to become enlightened as to the nature and oneness of the universe.

Sikh view. "Sikh" means student, which denotes that followers will lead their lives forever learning. They interpret God as the Universe itself. Sikhism thus sees life as an opportunity to understand this God as well as to discover the divinity which lies in each individual. They seek union with God and liberation from rebirth in the material world.

Taoist views. The Taoists cosmogony emphasizes the need for all sentient beings and all man to return to the primordial or to rejoin with the Oneness of the Universe by way of self-correction and self realization.

Shinto views. Shinto wants life to live, not to die. Shinto sees death as pollution and regards life as the realm where the divine spirit seeks to purify itself by rightful self-development. Shinto wants individual human life to be prolonged forever on earth as a victory of the divine spirit in preserving its objective personality in its highest forms.

Confucian views. Confucianism recognizes human nature in accordance with the need for discipline and education. Confucianists see a goal in achieving the good nature through strong relationships and reasoning as well as minimizing the negative energy. They can realize the ultimate meaning of life in ordinary human existence.

Zoroastrian view. For those who chose good actions, a blissful afterlife is promised, as well as a return to earth to continue life in a physical form.

Scientific approaches. The primary aim of the scientific approach to the meaning of life is to describe the empirical facts about human existence. Claims that empirical science can shed light on issues such as the meaning of life are highly disputed within the scientific and philosophy-of-science communities, and have been from the very beginning of science. Biologists have suggested that insofar as there may be a primary function to life, it may be the survival of genes.

WOW! Amazing diversity, like life itself. No wonder war doesn’t work. You can force people to submit but not to believe.

32 years ago, I heard a definition of the Purpose of Life that made the most sense to me. It was from Dr. Andrew Galambos who defined the Purpose of Life as reversing entropy.

According to the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, systems, including our universe fall apart with the passage of time. It’s called entropy and is what many say will be the cause of the end of life… the gradual death of the universe. Without intervention, the universe will most likely go from order to disorder, cool off, wind down and finally collapse. Reversing entropy, or creating order out of disorder, is conscious life’s grandest challenge according to Galambos. So my Purpose of Life is…

…to preserve life.

Pure and simple. A universal truth? You can adhere to almost any philosophy and not argue with that. Can’t you? If you disagree, let me know.


David A. Kekich

Maximum Life Foundation

714-641-0700/Fax 714-464-4135

www.MaxLife.org

 

"Where Biotech, Infotech and Nanotech

     Meet to Reverse Aging by 2029"

 

Published Monday, June 30, 2008 12:52 PM by David Kekich

Comment Notification

Join or sign in to track comments

Comments

 

Sophia Eudemon wrote on July 25, 2008 4:46 AM

The "Utilitarian Model Flexibility" has problems in addition to the fact it claims we have no way of knowing objective reality.

1. Humans do not have the time, information or intellectual processing ability to apply such a model. Imagine something as simple as picking out what we want to eat for dinner. We'd starve to death long before we evaluated all possibilities and took the best one. Humans normally and reasonably follow a close enough is good enough model.

2. Life is like game theory. Most games require two or more players. If we do our own thing without having others playing by the same rules we're trying to be in a game with one player. Almost any foundation of behavior ("game") is preferable to a bunch of individuals in intellectual free fall trying to figure out things on their own independently of others. A prime example of this is gendered behavior. Mostly it is a big game for men and women. But, the rules are well known and work for most people. Gender queer sorts who want to write rules that apply only to themselves usually find rough sailing ahead.

3. For most people their identity is important to them. Identity is relatively inflexible. This removes one of the three legs of the Utilitarian Model. Which therefore invalidates it.

Sophia E.

Join or sign in to post a comment
Submit

About David Kekich

CEO, Maximum Life Foundation
Advertise | Help | Contact | About | Terms | Privacy | Copyright © 2007 Betterhumans | Powered by Community Server | Partners:
World Transhumanist Association Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Immortality Institute Methuselah Mouse Prize Foresight Institute Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Lifeboat Foundation